INTRODUCTION
The publication Salinity on Australian Farms 2002 presents the first results of the Land Management and Salinity Survey which was conducted in May 2002 as a supplement to the 2001 Agricultural Census. Additional results from the survey will be made available at a later date with details to be advised in the ABS Release Advice. The additional results will include further information and analysis. Some Agricultural Census results have been included in this publication to provide contextual and other information, and Agricultural Census information is clearly identified where it is used.
The 2002 Land Management and Salinity Survey was mainly targeted at the reference population of farm establishments which answered yes to either or both questions in the 2001 Agricultural Census regarding having land affected by salinity or using salinity management strategies. The survey results in this publication are based on a sample of approximately 20,000 farms establishments and the results have been weighted to cover the full reference population.
Salinity naturally occurs in Australia, but the clearing of native vegetation and use of water for irrigated agriculture, domestic and other uses has caused the salt stored beneath the ground to surface in many areas. This has affected agricultural production and damaged civil infrastructure, such as roads.
Salinity is divided into two types, dryland and irrigated. Dryland salinity is far more widespread but, in both types of salinity, it is water imbalances that are the fundamental cause of salinisation. Primarily to address the issue of dryland salinity, the Commonwealth and State and Territory Governments have adopted the National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality (NAP). The NAP has identified 21 high priority regions and data for these regions are reported in this publication. A map of these regions can be found here.
The 2002 Land Management and Salinity Survey collected information from farmers on the extent of land showing signs of salinity as well as the strategies used by farmers to manage and prevent salinity. Farmer assessments of the extent of salinity may differ from assessments made by scientific means, but are an indication of the level of salinity occurring on farms that can be provided rapidly and cost-effectively. The 2002 Land Management and Salinity Survey also has the advantage that farm management activities can be assessed in the context of economic and other information collected by the ABS and other agencies.
It is important to note that the 2002 Land Management and Salinity Survey provides information for agricultural land as defined for the ABS agricultural collections (see explanatory notes). Agricultural land defined in this way occupies approximately 460 million hectares, representing 60% of land use in Australia, but salinity and salinity management also occur on non-agricultural land. Non-agricultural land was out of scope for the 2002 Land Management and Salinity Survey.
Several of the strategies used to manage salinity as reported in this publication are also used by farmers for other reasons. For example, pastures are sown with lucerne, or trees planted, for reasons other than salinity. The results presented in this publication only refer to the activities specifically identified for salinity management by farmers. The activity may have more than one purpose and is only reported where it was wholly or partly for salinity management.
MAIN FINDINGS
- A little under 20,000 farms and 2 million hectares of agricultural land were reported by farmers as showing signs of salinity.
- Nearly 30,000 farms have implemented salinity management practices.
- Of the agricultural land showing signs of salinity, 800,000 hectares is unable to be used for agricultural production.
- The state most affected by salinity is Western Australia, with 7,000 farms and 1.2 million hectares showing signs of salinity.
- Farms within the regions identified in the National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality (NAP regions), account for 17,000 farms or 87% of farms showing signs of salinity and 1.3 million hectares or 66% of the area showing signs of salinity. The NAP region most affected by salinity was Avon (WA) with 2,297 farms and 450,000 hectares showing signs of salinity.
- Non-irrigated farms accounted for 1.8 million hectares or 93% of the agricultural land showing signs of salinity.
- Farms primarily involved with the production of beef cattle, sheep and grains accounted for 16,000 or 82% of the farms showing signs of salinity and 1.9 million hectares or 97% of the agricultural land showing signs of salinity.
- The most common salinity management practices employed were:
- Crops, pastures and fodder plants for salinity management, 3.2 million hectares
- Trees for salinity management, 776,000 hectares
- Earthworks (levees, banks and drains) for salinity management, 208,000 km
- Fencing for salinity management, with 466,000 hectares fenced
- Just over 7,000 irrigated farms had made changes to irrigation practices for salinity management purposes.
- The main motivations for implementation of salinity management practices were for:
- Farm sustainability (66% of farmers implementing change saying this was of high importance)
- Environmental protection (56%)
- Increase or maintain agricultural production (54% )
- The main reported barriers to changing land management practices were lack of financial resources and lack of time (35% and 21% of all farmers reporting these as very limiting, respectively). Lack of information or doubts about likely success were not considered by a majority of farmers to be barriers to change (in each case 52% of all farmers reported these as not a factor).
Comparisons with other data
The results from the Land Management and Salinity Survey show a lower level of saline land than other sources (see table 5). Factors most likely to be contributing to differences are the different concepts, assessment methods and coverage used in each study. The ABS survey covered agricultural land as it is defined for ABS agricultural collections, which covers about 60% of Australian land, and collected information on all salinity (not just dryland salinity as in the other studies). In addition, in the ABS survey it was farmers who identified the land showing signs of salinity. While farmers' perceptions of the area will differ from scientific assessments, they are more or less consistent with the other studies, in terms of the relative area affected by salinity in each state and territory. In all studies, WA is the state most affected by salinity and NT, ACT and Tas. are the least affected.
The National Land and Water Resources Audit (NLWRA) 2001 used information on water table height to estimate the risk of land becoming saline affected. The area at risk of salinity is not equivalent to the area showing signs of salinity, but the two are correlated. The Prime Minister's Science, Engineering and Innovation Council (PMSEIC) 1999 estimate is based on expert assessments of the area affected by salinity, and includes non-agricultural land.
Fact sheets
Facts sheets for the states and territories as well as one for the NAP regions can be found in the media release.
Map of NAP Regions
SUMMARY TABLES
1 LAND SHOWING SIGNS OF SALINITY, SUMMARY BY STATE
|
State | Farms with land showing signs of salinity Farms with land showing signs of salinity | Proportion of total farms in State
(a) | Land showing signs of salinity | Proportion of total farm area in State
(b) | Salinised land unable to be used for production | Proportion of land showing signs of salinity (c) | Proportion of total farm area in State
(d) |
| no. | % | '000 ha | % | '000 ha | % | % |
NSW/ACT | 3108 | 7.4 | 124 | 0.20 | 44 | 35.6 | 0.1 |
Vic. | 4834 | 13.7 | 139 | 1.1 | 60 | 43.5 | 0.5 |
Qld | 993 | 3.4 | 107 | 0.1 | 40 | 37.4 | - |
SA | 3328 | 21.6 | *350 | 0.6 | 105 | 30.1 | 0.2 |
WA | 6918 | 51.3 | 1241 | 1.1 | 567 | 45.7 | 0.5 |
Tas. | 390 | 9.1 | 6 | 0.3 | 2 | 27.2 | 0.1 |
NT | 8 | 2.0 | 2 | - | 2 | 97.3 | - |
Total Australia | 19579 | 13.9 | 1969 | 0.4 | 821 | 41.7 | 0.2 |
|
(a) Farms with land showing signs of salinity as a proportion of total farms in the State/Territory/Australia. Source for the denominator is data from the ABS 2001 Agricultural Census.
(b) Land showing signs of salinity as a proportion of total farm land in the State/Territory/Australia. Source for the denominator is data from the ABS 2001 Agricultural Census.
(c) Salinised land unable to be used for production as a proportion of land showing signs of salinity.
(d) Salinised land unable to be used for production as a proportion of total farm land in the State/Territory/Australia. Source for the denominator is data from the ABS 2001 Agricultural Census.
* subject to sampling variability between 25-50%
2 SALINITY MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES, SUMMARY BY STATE(a)
|
State | Crops, pastures and fodder plants | Trees | Land fenced from grazing | Earthworks |
| '000 ha | '000 ha | '000 ha | '000 km |
NSW/ACT | 1096 | 91 | 17 | 43 |
Vic. | *680 | 40 | 40 | 37 |
Qld | 331 | 126 | *267 | 15 |
SA | 452 | 14 | 29 | *13 |
WA | 633 | 500 | 352 | 98 |
Tas. | *7 | 5 | 1 | *3 |
NT | *6 | - | - | - |
Total Australia | 3205 | 776 | 466 | 207959.12 |
|
(a) Any land management practice undertaken wholly or partly for the management or prevention of salinity.
* subject to sampling variability between 25-50%
3 REASONS FOR CHANGING LAND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, AUSTRALIA (a)
|
Reason | Not a reason | Low importance | Medium importance | High importance | Total |
| % | % | % | % | % |
Increased productivity | 18.6 | 6.7 | 20.5 | 54.2 | 100 |
Increased land value | 28.8 | 15.4 | 27.7 | 28.1 | 100 |
Improved risk management | 33.2 | 12.1 | 25.8 | 28.9 | 100 |
Farm sustainability | 13.5 | *3.9 | 16.3 | 66.3 | 100 |
Improved environment protection | 12.6 | 5.1 | 26.8 | 55.6 | 100 |
|
(a) Farms managing for salinity and/or with land showing signs of salinity that have changed land management practices because of salinity or to prevent salinity
* subject to sampling variability between 25-50%
4 BARRIERS TO CHANGING LAND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, AUSTRALIA(a)
|
Barrier | Not a factor | Not very limiting | Limiting | Very limiting | Total |
| % | % | % | % | % |
Lack of financial resources | 23.8 | 7.9 | 32.8 | 35.5 | 100 |
Lack of time | 29.7 | 13.4 | 36.1 | 20.8 | 100 |
Insufficient or inadequate information | 52.1 | 24.8 | 17.4 | 5.8 | 100 |
Doubts about likely success | 51.8 | 23.1 | 18.3 | 6.8 | 100 |
Age or poor health | 70.6 | 12.5 | 10.3 | 6.6 | 100 |
|
(a) Farms managing for salinity and/or with land showing signs of salinity.
5 AREA AFFECTED BY SALINITY, COMPARISON OF SURVEY RESULTS WITH OTHER ESTIMATES
|
State | PMSEIC 1999 | NLWRA 2001 | ABS 2002 |
| Area of salinity affected land (a) | Area at risk of salinity (b) | Area showing signs of salinity (c) |
| '000 ha | '000 ha | '000 ha |
NSW/ACT | 120 | 181 | 124 |
Vic. | 120 | 670 | 138 |
Qld | 10 | n.a. | 106 |
SA | 402 | 390 | 350 |
WA | 1802 | 4363 | 1241 |
Tas. | 20 | 54 | 6 |
NT | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Total Australia | 2476 | 5658 | 1969 |
|
(a) As determined by experts.
(b) As estimated from water table heights.
(c) As reported by farmers.
6 LAND SHOWING SIGNS OF SALINITY, BY NAP REGION (a)
|
NAP Region | Farms with land showing signs of salinity | Proportion of farms in region (b) | Land showing signs of salinity | Proportion of total farm area in region (c) | Salinised land unable to be used for production | Proportion of land showing signs of salinity unable to be used for production in NAP Region
(d) |
| no. | % | '000 ha | % | '000 ha | % |
Avocca-Loddon-Campaspe | 1254 | 27.9 | 39 | 1.9 | 13 | 33.5 |
Avon | 2297 | 79.9 | 451 | 5.8 | 285 | 63.2 |
Border Rivers | 150 | 4.3 | na | 0.2 | na | na |
Burdekin-Fitzroy | 152 | 3.3 | **36 | 0.1 | **20 | 56.4 |
Condamine-Balonne-Maranoa | 145 | 2.3 | *28 | 0.2 | ** 2 | 7.7 |
Darwin-Katherine | 1 | 0.4 | 2 | - | 2 | 100.0 |
Glenelg-Hopkins-Corangamite | 1438 | 18.7 | *31 | 1.2 | 10 | 33.0 |
Goulburn-Broken | 512 | 9.2 | 7 | 0.5 | 2 | 23.2 |
Lachlan-Murrumbidgee | 1477 | 14.8 | *47 | 0.5 | 5 | 11.7 |
Lockyer-Burnet-Mary | 255 | 3.6 | *2 | 0.1 | *1 | 48.5 |
Lower Murray | 1658 | 15.4 | 111 | 0.5 | 56 | 50.3 |
Macquarie-Castlereagh | 497 | 8.5 | 9 | 0.1 | *4 | 39.4 |
Midlands | 318 | 15.6 | *5 | 0.4 | *1 | 27.6 |
Mt. Lofty-Kangaroo Island- Northern Agricultural District | 2001 | 27.1 | *59 | 1.3 | **25 | 42.5 |
Murray | 306 | 8.9 | *12 | 0.3 | 2 | 18.6 |
Namoi-Gwydir | 277 | 7.1 | *7 | 0.2 | * 1 | 10.3 |
Northern Agricultural District | 878 | 55.0 | 153 | 2.8 | 92 | 60.4 |
Ord | 9 | 8.6 | - | - | - | 22.7 |
South Coast | 1428 | 61.8 | 75 | 2.4 | 43 | 57.2 |
South East | 266 | 10.3 | 61 | 3.6 | *10 | 16.9 |
South West | 1793 | 38.8 | 157 | 5.0 | 79 | 50.7 |
Total NAP | 17131 | 17.7 | 1302 | 0.9 | 671 | 51.6 |
Total non-NAP | 2449 | 5.6 | 667 | 0.2 | 150 | 22.5 |
Total Australia | 19579 | 13.9 | 1969 | 0.4 | 821 | 41.7 |
|
(a) NAP regions are the 21 priority regions identified in the National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality.
(b) Farms with land showing signs of salinity as a proportion of total farms in the NAP region/Australia. Source for the denominator is data from the ABS 2001 Agricultural Census.
(c) Land showing signs of salinity as a proportion of total farm area in the NAP region/Australia. Source for the denominator is data from the ABS 2001 Agricultural Census.
(d) Salinised land unable to be used for production as a proportion of land showing signs of salinity.
* subject to sampling variability between 25-50%
** subject to sampling variability of over 50%
7 AREA SHOWING SIGNS OF SALINITY, AREA WITHIN AND OUTSIDE OF NAP REGIONS (a)
|
|
NAP region | Non-NAP | Total
(NAP and non-NAP) |
| 000 ha | 000 ha | 000 ha |
NSW/ACT | 113 | * 12 | 125 |
Vic. | 129 | 9 | 138 |
Qld | 67 | *40 | 107 |
SA | 152 | *199 | 351 |
WA | 836 | 405 | 1241 |
Tas | 5 | 1 | 6 |
NT | 2 | *- | 2 |
Total Australia | 1302 | 667 | 1969 |
| | | |
| % | % | % |
NSW/ACT | 90 | 10 | 100 |
Vic. | 94 | 6 | 100 |
Qld | 62 | 38 | 100 |
SA | 43 | 57 | 100 |
WA | 67 | 33 | 100 |
Tas | 75 | 25 | 100 |
NT | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Total Australia | 66 | 34 | 100 |
|
(a) NAP regions are the 21 priority regions identified in the National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality.
* subject to sampling variability between 25-50%