Page tools: Print Page Print All | |||||||||||||||
SHAPING THE ABS STATISTICAL WORK PROGRAM These tiers are used to assist with the prioritisation of the ABS work program.
From 2015, the ABS will implement a new approach to determining the ABS statistical forward work program, which includes publishing a work program prioritisation document, including the categorisation outlined above, as part of this Forward Work Program publication, and engaging with governments, users and other stakeholders on the prioritisation. Following the consultation, the ABS will seek input from the Australian Statistics Advisory Council and the Australian Government into the final determination of the statistical forward work program. The ABS statistical work program, categorised by tier, is provided in the appendix of this publication. PRINCIPLES TO BE APPLIED IN PRIORITISING THE ABS WORK PROGRAM 1. Maintain its organisational infrastructure, knowledge and capability, so as not to erode its capacity to operate as a credible and responsive developed country National Statistical Organisation (NSO) across the four fields of economic, population, social and environmental statistics consistent with the scope of our legislated functions. 2. Maintain the scope and quality of statistics in a manner that ensures public confidence in the accuracy and relevance of the data. 3. Maintain statistical programs that are generally regarded as critical to effective governance and an efficient economy. 4. In other areas of work:
CRITERIA FOR ACHIEVING AN APPROPRIATE BALANCE IN THE ABS WORK PROGRAM The ABS does not have the resources to undertake all of the activities that fall within its mandate and which users would ideally require. In balancing the ABS's program of collection and other activities, the Statistician seeks to ensure that ABS resources are used to the maximum benefit of Australian governments and the broader community. In assessing this, the ABS takes account of the value of the information being sought, the extent to which the ABS undertaking the activity would make a difference, and the costs that the activity would impose upon the ABS and the broader community. In assessing the value of the information, the ABS carefully considers: the importance of the issue from a public policy and/or community interest perspective; views of Australian and state/territory government agencies; the depth and breadth of user interest in the wider community; opinions of recognised experts in the field; the extent to which the information would impact on decision making; and any international reporting obligations. In assessing the extent to whether the ABS undertaking the proposed activity would make a difference, the ABS also considers:
In assessing the cost of the activity, the ABS takes account of the:
USER FUNDED ACTIVITIES The ABS encourages stakeholders to consider funding statistical activities, particularly around lower priority activities discussed in the next section. The ABS undertakes user funded work where:
Document Selection These documents will be presented in a new window.
|