4528.0 - Personal Fraud, 2010-2011 Quality Declaration
ARCHIVED ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 19/04/2012
Page tools: Print Page Print All | ||||
SCAMS SCAM EXPOSURE AND VICTIMISATION RATES BY AGE(a) (a) Rates are calculated as a percentage of total persons in each demographic sub-population MARITAL STATUS AND COUNTRY OF BIRTH Both the exposure rate and the victimisation rate for scams was higher for married persons than unmarried persons (39.4% compared to 30.3% for exposure, and 3.2% compared to 2.5% for victimisation). Exposure to scams was higher for persons born in Australia than persons born overseas (36.5% compared to 34.1%), although there was no statistically significant difference in the victimisation rate (3.0% and 2.8%). LABOUR FORCE STATUS AND EDUCATION ATTAINMENT Employed persons were more likely to be exposed to a scam than unemployed persons (39.5% compared to 34.5%), however both were more likely to be exposed than persons not in the labour force (28.4%). In terms of victimisation, employed persons were more likely to be victims than persons not in the labour force (3.2% compared to 2.1%). Persons with a degree, diploma, or higher education were more likely to be exposed to a scam than persons with other non-school qualifications (44.8 % compared to 37.7%), however both were more likely to be exposed than persons with no non-school qualification (28.3%). Persons with a degree, diploma, or higher education and persons with other non-school qualifications were also more likely to be victims than persons with no non-school qualification (3.6% and 3.2% compared to 2.3%). PERSONAL AND HOUSEHOLD WEEKLY INCOME In terms of personal weekly income, persons earning $1,500–$1,999 and $2,000 and over were more likely to be exposed to a scam (50.8% and 48.9%) than persons earning less than these amounts. Persons earning $1,500–$1,999 were also more likely to be a victim of a scam than persons earning $0-$499 (4.0% compared to 2.6%). SCAM EXPOSURE AND VICTIMISATION RATES BY PERSONAL WEEKLY INCOME(a) (a) Rates are calculated as a percentage of total persons in each demographic sub-population Persons in the highest quintile of equivalised household weekly income were more likely to be exposed to a scam (45.7%) than persons in the other quintiles. Persons in the lowest quintile were less likely to be a victim (2.3%) than persons in the third (3.5%), fourth (3.4%), and highest (3.7%) quintiles. SCAM EXPOSURE AND VICTIMISATION RATES BY EQUIVALISED HOUSEHOLD WEEKLY INCOME(a)(b) (a) Rates are calculated as a percentage of total persons in each demographic sub-population (b) For information on equivalised household weekly income, see Explanatory Notes 32–36
|