6107.0 - Information paper: Outcomes of the Labour Household Surveys Content Review, 2012
ARCHIVED ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 19/02/2013 First Issue
Page tools: Print Page Print All | ||||
INTRODUCTION
Labour supplementary surveys are currently conducted across five months of the year:
The following labour topics are currently included within the MPHS program:
In addition to these surveys, the Survey of Employment Arrangements, Retirement and Superannuation (SEARS) includes a labour component. SEARS was last conducted in 2007. BACKGROUND TO THE REVIEW In late 2010, the ABS commenced a review of its labour household surveys program. The review aimed to improve the relevance of data released, maximise the coherence of interrelated topics and minimise the duplication of content. The scope of the review included the LFS, labour supplementary surveys and labour MPHS topics. Consideration was given to the program's continued relevance in contemporary labour market indicators, its ability to meet emerging priorities, and the relationships between content of the LFS, the supplementary surveys and MPHS topics. Considering all of these aspects of the labour household survey program ensured that the proposed new program was based on a holistic 'labour household survey information set' perspective, rather than being constrained on the basis of the existing content of current surveys. WHY REVIEW THE LABOUR HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS PROGRAM? Over recent years there have been many changes to the structure of the labour market and the nature of work. It had also been many years since the ABS undertook a holistic review of its labour household surveys program; many of the current labour surveys have origins in the 1970's and 1980's, and as a result they, to some extent, reflect an outdated view of work and the labour market, and the interest therein. Ad-hoc and survey specific reviews have been conducted from time to time to keep the program as relevant as possible, but a holistic review was needed to ensure ABS labour statistics continue to deliver high quality, coherent, conceptually robust and relevant statistics into the future. There have also been increasing cost pressures on the ABS. As one of the larger survey programs within the ABS, there was both the potential, and the necessity, to consider how the program could be refined so that it continues to meet user requirements, but in a more efficient and effective manner. CONSULTATION WITH USERS OF ABS LABOUR STATISTICS User consultation was a critical component of the labour household surveys content review and was conducted in a number of stages. Initial discussions were held with key users and members of the ABS's Labour Statistics Advisory Group in early 2011, which shaped some of the broad requirements, potential developments and initial priorities. A user consultation package, which comprised background information and a range of questions and issues on which to provide feedback, was then distributed to a wide range of users in mid 2011. A number of discussions and meetings were held with key users, who were also encouraged to provide written submissions to the review. A note outlining the review was included in Australian Labour Market Statistics (cat. no. 6105.0) and on the Labour Topics @ A Glance Page on the ABS web site, inviting comments. The consultation process was generally constructive, with many users providing valuable feedback on unmet needs and priorities, as well as suggestions for improvements to the survey program. All comments and views were considered, with practicalities, cost and feasibility of the changes determining the extent to which they were adopted. BENEFITS OF CHANGING THE LABOUR HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS PROGRAM The outcomes of the labour household surveys content review will lead to improvements across the survey program to provide a more comprehensive suite of labour statistics. The main advantages are summarised in the four areas below.
PURPOSE OF THIS INFORMATION PAPER This information paper outlines the intended changes to the labour household survey program resulting from the review, as well as expected timing for their implementation. The directions and changes that are outlined in this paper may change subject to testing and an assessment of statistical impact, to ensure that the changes will not have an adverse impact on respondent burden or on LFS estimates. A second information paper is planned to be released in 2014 following testing in late 2013 and early 2014. This subsequent paper will provide more detailed information on the content of each of the surveys and the dissemination of the statistics.
|