KEY FINDINGS
Estimates of Personal Income for Small Areas uses tax data to describe personal income and its distribution across Australia. A comprehensive range of income indicators can be compared across relatively small regional areas (including the Local Government Area level and Greater Capital City Statistical Area level in this summary, and Statistical Area levels 2, 3 and 4, which are also available in the datacubes).
It should be noted that some income earners are not represented in these statistics because they did not submit a tax return. This coverage gap is likely to include many individuals who earned below the tax-free threshold and many Government benefit recipients, therefore providing an incomplete picture of low income earners. This is important to consider when comparing estimates in this release with distribution-based measures from other statistical collections (for example the Gini coefficients, which will be higher in this release).
The Australian Bureau of Statistics acknowledges the invaluable support of the Australian Tax Office in compiling these statistics.
OVERVIEW OF PERSONAL INCOME IN AUSTRALIA
- In 2015-16, the total personal income of the 13.4 million persons who submitted a tax return was $827.9 billion.
- Median income was $47,692, an increase of 1.8 per cent on the previous financial year and an increase of 17 per cent since 2010-11.
- The Australian Capital Territory continued to record the highest mean income, although it also recorded one of the slowest growth rates over the six year period.
- South Australia had the slowest overall growth rate over the six year period.
- Western Australian growth has also slowed markedly in recent years. Over the six year period, 2015-16 saw Western Australia record its first year of negative year-on-year growth.
- The Northern Territory recorded the highest growth rate over the six year period, driven by very strong growth in the Greater Darwin area.
- Income inequality indicated by the Gini coefficient was highest in New South Wales and lowest in the Northern Territory.
A selection of income indicators are presented in Table 1, providing an overview of the distribution of income across Australia.
TABLE 1. SELECTED PERSONAL INCOME DISTRIBUTION INDICATORS, Greater Capital City Statistical Areas, 2015-16
| Median total income | Median income growth rate 2010-11 to 2015-16 | Median income growth rate 2014-15 to 2015-16 | INCOME SHARE
| Gini coefficient |
| Top 1% of earners | Top 5% of earners | Top 10% of earners |
| $ | % | % | % | % | % | |
|
Greater Sydney | 50 724 | 17.4 | 2.3 | 11.9 | 25.7 | 36.6 | 0.503 |
Rest of New South Wales | 43 557 | 17.8 | 2.6 | 7.3 | 19.9 | 31.2 | 0.471 |
New South Wales | 48 085 | 17.9 | 2.6 | 10.9 | 24.3 | 35.3 | 0.496 |
|
Greater Melbourne | 48 572 | 15.3 | 2.2 | 10.0 | 23.2 | 34.1 | 0.481 |
Rest of Victoria | 42 019 | 15.6 | 1.5 | 7.0 | 19.6 | 30.7 | 0.467 |
Victoria | 46 984 | 15.9 | 2.3 | 9.5 | 22.6 | 33.6 | 0.479 |
|
Greater Brisbane | 49 482 | 16.9 | 1.8 | 8.7 | 21.6 | 32.5 | 0.464 |
Rest of Queensland | 44 468 | 18.0 | 1.8 | 7.4 | 20.3 | 31.7 | 0.471 |
Queensland | 46 869 | 17.5 | 1.8 | 8.2 | 21.1 | 32.1 | 0.468 |
| | | | | | | |
Greater Adelaide | 47 307 | 15.7 | 1.6 | 8.2 | 20.7 | 31.2 | 0.452 |
Rest of South Australia | 41 778 | 14.4 | 1.0 | 6.4 | 19.0 | 30.3 | 0.463 |
South Australia | 46 110 | 15.6 | 1.5 | 7.9 | 20.4 | 31.1 | 0.455 |
| | | | | | | |
Greater Perth | 53 200 | 17.2 | -0.8 | 9.0 | 22.4 | 33.8 | 0.484 |
Rest of Western Australia | 49 634 | 18.9 | -1.3 | 6.4 | 19.1 | 30.9 | 0.479 |
Western Australia | 52 504 | 17.6 | -0.9 | 8.6 | 21.8 | 33.3 | 0.483 |
| | | | | | | |
Greater Hobart | 46 411 | 16.1 | 2.2 | 7.6 | 19.6 | 30.0 | 0.441 |
Rest of Tasmania | 41 790 | 15.1 | 1.4 | 7.1 | 19.2 | 29.9 | 0.454 |
Tasmania | 43 833 | 15.9 | 1.8 | 7.3 | 19.4 | 30.0 | 0.448 |
| | | | | | | |
Greater Darwin | 62 211 | 23.3 | 2.7 | 6.8 | 18.5 | 29.2 | 0.420 |
Rest of Northern Territory | 54 315 | 18.8 | 4.9 | 5.2 | 16.0 | 26.3 | 0.406 |
Northern Territory | 59 466 | 21.1 | 2.5 | 6.5 | 18.2 | 28.8 | 0.420 |
| | | | | | | |
Australian Capital Territory | 63 061 | 15.7 | 2.6 | 6.5 | 18.3 | 28.7 | 0.421 |
| | | | | | | |
Australia | 47 692 | 17.0 | 1.8 | 9.5 | 22.7 | 33.8 | 0.484 |
|
SOURCES OF PERSONAL INCOME
Overall, employee income continues to make the highest contribution to total personal income in Australia, at 77 per cent.
South Australia recorded the lowest relative contribution of employee income, at 74 per cent of total income recorded for South Australia in 2015-16. This pattern is consistent over time, and is countered by the relatively high contributions of all other income types to South Australia's total income levels.
In 2015-16, Own unincorporated business income contributed more to South Australia's total personal income than in any other state (8.5%, compared to 7.8% Australia-wide). Australian Capital Territory continued to record the lowest Own unincorporated business income contribution, at only 3.9 per cent of its total income.
Table 2 details the median income by source from 2010-11 to 2015-16.
TABLE 2. SOURCES OF PERSONAL INCOME, Australia, 2010-11 to 2015-16
| MEDIAN INCOME
|
| 2010-11 | 2011-12 | 2012-13 | 2013-14 | 2014-15 | 2015-16 |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
|
Employee | 41 181 | 43 173 | 44 644 | 45 725 | 46 999 | 48 413 |
Own unincorporated business | 10 064 | 10 303 | 10 171 | 10 953 | 11 581 | 11 669 |
Investment | 407 | 392 | 360 | 337 | 293 | 242 |
Superannuation & annuities | 17 169 | 18 184 | 18 003 | 18 857 | 19 736 | 19 933 |
Total Income1 | 40 770 | 42 987 | 44 778 | 45 828 | 46 854 | 47 692 |
|
1 Total income from all sources excluding Government pensions and allowances, and including Other income.
REGIONAL TOTAL MEDIAN PERSONAL INCOME
The Local Government Area (LGA) with the highest median total income was Ashburton within the Pilbara region of Western Australia ($100,665). Since the previous year, the top five highest median income areas in New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia and Western Australia have remained stable.
Woden Valley rose from fifth to third in the Australian Capital Territory rankings, and Alice Springs nudged West Arnhem out of the Northern Territory's top five. Queensland and Tasmania's top five were shuffled around by Bulloo and King Island which both entered the top five in 2015-16, while Gladstone (Queensland) and West Coast (Tasmania) both dropped out of the top ranks from fourth and second place, respectively.
Table 3 lists the five LGAs within each state and territory with the highest median total income in 2015-16. Map 1 illustrates the distribution of median income throughout LGAs across the country.
TABLE 3. HIGHEST MEDIAN TOTAL PERSONAL INCOME LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREAS, for each state and territory, 2015-16
New South Wales | Victoria | Queensland | South Australia |
|
Woollahra (A) $74 076 | Stonnington (C) $60 483 | Weipa (T) $81 123 | Roxby Downs (M) $82 195 |
Mosman (A) $74 068 | Port Phillip (C) $60 274 | Mount Isa (C) $68 995 | Walkerville (M) $60 198 |
North Sydney (A) $72 915 | Yarra (C) $59 284 | Isaac (R) $68 564 | Unley (C) $55 452 |
Hunters Hill (A) $69 912 | Bayside (C) $58 909 | Bulloo (S) $61 568 | Burnside (C) $55 059 |
Lane Cove (A) $67 210 | Boroondara (C) $57 306 | Cloncurry (S) $59 778 | Whyalla (C) $52 980 |
|
Western Australia | Tasmania | Northern Territory | Australian Capital Territory1 |
|
Ashburton (S) $100 665 | Hobart (C) $48 253 | Palmerston (C) $66 171 | South Canberra $78 357 |
Peppermint Grove (S) $89 795 | Clarence (C) $47 210 | Litchfield (M) $62 218 | Molonglo $74 863 |
Port Hedland (T) $82 349 | Kingborough (M) $47 116 | Darwin (C) $60 354 | Woden Valley $64 254 |
Karratha (C) $81 933 | King Island (M) $45 322 | Wagait (S) $60 000 | North Canberra $63 962 |
East Pilbara (S) $76 575 | Brighton (M) $45 158 | Alice Springs (T) $55 962 | Gungahlin $63 906 |
|
1The Australian Capital Territory does not have Local Government Areas, so information is presented at the Statistical Area 3 level of the Australian Statistical Geography Standard
MAP 1. MEDIAN TOTAL PERSONAL INCOME, Local Government Areas, 2015-16
REGIONAL TOTAL PERSONAL INCOME GROWTH
Of the regions with more than one thousand earners, the highest income growth since 2010-11 occurred in the Torres region of Queensland, with median total income increasing by 25 per cent. This region also demonstrated the highest year-on-year growth at 30 per cent. Tables 4 and 5 provide further details of the highest growing regions. Income growth by LGAs is shown in Map 2.
TABLE 4. HIGHEST GROWING TOTAL MEDIAN PERSONAL INCOME LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREAS (for areas with more than 1,000 earners), 2010-11 to 2015-16
| | Median Total Income
2010-11 | Median Total Income
2015-16 | Change from 2010-11 |
| | $ | $ | % |
|
Torres (S) | Queensland | 40 196 | 53 597 | 25.0 |
Murrumbidgee (A) | New South Wales | 32 430 | 43 211 | 24.9 |
Ashburton (S) | Western Australia | 77 310 | 100 665 | 23.2 |
Cottesloe (T) | Western Australia | 56 699 | 73 724 | 23.1 |
Gunnedah (A) | New South Wales | 35 267 | 45 455 | 22.4 |
|
TABLE 5. HIGHEST GROWING TOTAL MEDIAN PERSONAL INCOME LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREAS (for areas with more than 1,000 earners), 2014-15 to 2015-16
| | Median Total Income
2014-15 | Median Total Income
2015-16 | Change from 2014-15 |
| | $ | $ | % |
|
Gwydir (A) | New South Wales | 34 193 | 38 152 | 10.4 |
Walgett (A) | New South Wales | 32 219 | 35 739 | 9.8 |
North Burnett (R) | Queensland | 29 964 | 32 949 | 9.1 |
Balonne (S) | Queensland | 39 330 | 43 037 | 8.6 |
Glen Innes Severn (A) | New South Wales | 31 261 | 34 058 | 8.2 |
|
MAP 2. MEDIAN TOTAL PERSONAL INCOME GROWTH RATES, Local Government Area, 2010-11 to 2015-16
INCOME INEQUALITY - GINI COEFFICIENT
The Gini coefficient is a summary indicator between 0 and 1 which measures the degree of inequality of total income within a region. A value of 0 indicates that all earners reported the same amount of income in that region, and higher values represent relatively higher income inequality.
Underlying data limitations mean that the Gini coefficients in this publication can't be compared with the Gini coefficients produced in other publications. The measures in this release provide a useful view of change in income inequality in a region over time, and they also provide an informative comparison of income inequality across regions, which are frequent and detailed. The coefficients are calculated from gross personal income and not from equivalised disposable income, and are drawn from data with coverage limitations (approximately 10% of employees don’t need to submit a tax return, and persons aged 60 years and over are generally under-represented in tax data). For national and state and territory estimates, users are encouraged to refer to
Household Income and Wealth, Australia, 2015-16 (cat. no. 6523.0). Gini coefficients in this publication are based on data from the ABS Survey of Income and Housing (SIH), which includes estimates of current income as well as estimates of annual income with respect to the previous financial year.
In 2015-16, Australia had a Gini coefficient of 0.484, with values for the states and territories ranging from 0.496 in New South Wales to 0.420 in the Northern Territory. Of the areas with greater than one thousand earners, Table 6 shows the five LGAs with the lowest income inequality in Australia. In addition to relatively low inequality, Molonglo and Palmerston have a high proportion of earners in the top quartile.
TABLE 6. LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREAS WITH THE LOWEST GINI COEFFICIENT (for areas with more than 1,000 earners), 2015-16
| | Gini coefficient | Proportion of high earners | Proportion of region's income held by the top 10% of earners | Mean income |
| | | % | % | $ |
|
Molonglo | Australian Capital Territory2 | 0.339 | 44.1 | 23.7 | 78 284 |
Brighton (M) | Tasmania | 0.364 | 14.1 | 23.7 | 48 241 |
Glenorchy (C) | Tasmania | 0.378 | 13.8 | 24.2 | 47 233 |
Palmerston (C) | Northern Territory | 0.378 | 36.5 | 26.2 | 74 275 |
Playford (C) | South Australia | 0.379 | 12.9 | 24.6 | 46 780 |
1Proportion of earners in the top quartile (with income of $79,760 or more)
2The Australian Capital Territory does not have Local Government Areas. For the ACT, information at the Statistical Area 3 level of the Australian Statistical Geography Standard is included in LGA analysis
Table 7 shows the five LGAs with the highest Gini coefficients. Mosman and Woollahra have the highest mean incomes in Australia, with most of the region's income held by the top ten per cent of earners. Map 3 shows the distribution of Gini coefficient values by LGA.
TABLE 7. LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREAS WITH THE HIGHEST GINI COEFFICIENT (for areas with more than 1,000 earners), 2015-16
| | Gini coefficient | Proportion of high earners | Proportion of region's income held by the top 10% of earners | Mean income |
| | | % | % | $ |
|
York (S) | Western Australia | 0.664 | 22.3 | 45.7 | 56 516 |
Mosman (A) | New South Wales | 0.664 | 46.9 | 55.0 | 162 272 |
Woollahra (A) | New South Wales | 0.659 | 46.9 | 55.1 | 159 580 |
Mosman Park (T) | Western Australia | 0.649 | 40.7 | 52.3 | 126 597 |
Buloke (S) | Victoria | 0.639 | 10.8 | 34.3 | 34 346 |
MAP 3. GINI COEFFICIENT, Local Government Areas, 2015-16
Back to top