4519.0 - Recorded Crime - Offenders, 2010–11 
Quality Declaration
Quality Declaration ARCHIVED ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 09/02/2012
Page tools:
 Print Page
 Print All
| ||
EXPLANATORY NOTES
6 Due to quality and/or comparability issues, the statistics presented in this publication exclude the following:
REFERENCE PERIOD 7 The statistics in this collection relate to offenders proceeded against by police during the reference period 1 July 2010 and 30 June 2011. COUNTING METHODOLOGY 8 The main counting unit for this collection is the offender. 9 The following information provides an explanation as to how offenders and police proceedings are treated and counted in this collection. Date of action 10 Data are compiled on the basis of the date that police initiated action or proceeded against an offender (e.g. the date the offender was charged, the date the offender was cautioned, etc.). The date the offender was proceeded against by police may not be the date when the offence occurred, or the date when the offender came to the attention of police. In some jurisdictions the data may reflect the date of record creation rather than date of action, however, this does not have a significant impact on the comparability of data across jurisdictions for offenders as there are no major lags between the two dates. Offender counts 11 For the offender population, an offender is only counted once irrespective of how many offences they may have committed within the same incident or how many times they were dealt with by police during the reference period. All methods of proceedings are included in these counts (i.e. court and non-court actions). Police proceeding counts 12 For the police-initiated proceeding population, an offender may be counted more than once if proceeded against on separate occasions by police during the reference period. Data are presented for both court and non-court proceeding counts for all states and territories except Western Australia (refer to paragraphs 56-57). Principal offence 13 Offence information presented in this publication relates to the most serious offence or principal offence allegedly committed by an individual offender during the reference period. These statistics are not designed to provide a count of the total number of individual offences that come to the attention of police. 14 For the offender counts, where a single offence is processed by police on a single date, the offender is assigned that offence as their principal offence. Where multiple offences are committed within the same incident on a single date by an offender, the offender is assigned a principal offence based on the most serious offence using the ABS National Offence Index (NOI). For more information about the NOI refer to paragraph 24. Offenders proceeded against by police on more than one occasion in the reference period are also assigned a principal offence on this same basis. 15 For the police initiated-proceeding counts, offenders who are proceeded against more than once in the reference period are assigned a principal offence for each separate date of police action. The following diagram provides an illustration of the assigning of a principal offence and the resulting counts for both populations. Principal method of proceeding 16 As a person may be proceeded against for multiple offences, either in a single day or on different occasions, the various offences linked to that offender may result in different legal actions; that is, both court and non-court actions. For offender counts the method of proceeding will be determined by the principal offence assigned to that offender. For police proceeding counts, as offenders who are proceeded against more than once in the reference period are assigned a principal offence for each separate date of police action, they are also assigned the appropriate method linked to each principal offence. CLASSIFICATIONS 17 The national classifications used to collect and produce data about offenders are:
Australian and New Zealand Standard Offence Classification (ANZSOC), 2011 18 ANZSOC provides a uniform national classificatory framework for classifying offences across Australia for statistical purposes. The classification is a hierarchical structure allowing for varying degrees of detail to be published depending on the level of detail in the source information. Associated with each classification are coding rules which ensure that the counting of information is consistent across states and territories. The ABS released a second edition of the Australian Standard Offence Classification (ASOC) in 2008. 19 In 2011, the offence classification was updated from the Australian Standard Offence Classification (ASOC) to the Australian and New Zealand Standard Offence Classification (ANZSOC), however changes were not made to the content of the classification. For further information about ANZSOC refer to Australian and New Zealand Standard Offence Classification, 2011 (cat. no. 1234.0). 20 The offence information presented in this issue for the 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11 reference periods is based on the 2011 version of ANZSOC. Data presented in the 2007-08 issue of this publication are based on ASOC 1997 and are not comparable. 21 For ease of reading, some ANZSOC offence terms have been abbreviated throughout this publication. The term 'and related offences' has been omitted from the following ANZSOC offence names:
22 In addition, further ANZSOC offence terms have been abbreviated as follows:
23 For further information about ANSZOC offence classifications, refer to Appendix 3 and the Glossary. National Offence Index (NOI), 2009 24 The NOI is a tool which provides an ordinal ranking of all offence groups in ANZSOC according to perceived seriousness in order to determine a principal offence. The purpose of NOI is to enable the representation of an offender by a single offence in instances where multiple offences occur within the same incident or where offenders are proceeded against by police on more than one occasion in the reference period. For further information about NOI refer to National Offence Index, 2009 (cat. no. 1234.0.55.001). Method of Proceeding 25 The method of proceeding describes the type of legal action (court or non-court) initiated by police against a person as a result of an investigation of an offence(s). The type of legal action may change as further investigation is undertaken by police. Not all changes made during the reference period may be reflected in this collection. The method of proceeding classification is a hierarchical classification. For detailed information about the classification refer to Appendix 2. For information about the counting methodology used for methods of proceeding refer to paragraph 16. OFFENDER RATES 26 Offender rates are expressed as the number of offenders per 100,000 of the ABS Estimated Resident Population (ERP). These rates generally accord with international and state and territory practice, and enable the comparison of the extent and type of offending across the individual states and territories, as well as a comparison over time. 27 Rates for the offender population are calculated using the ERP as at the midpoint of the reference period (i.e. 31 December 2010). The ERP used in the calculation of these rates are for persons aged 10 years and over for all states and territories. Where rates are presented for an age group or a single year of age, the ERP used in the calculation of the rates refers to the relevant age group or single year of age. 28 For this collection, all estimates and projections for the Australian Capital Territory exclude Jervis Bay Territory. For more information on ERP, see Australian Demographic Statistics, December quarter, 2010 (cat. no. 3101.0). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander offender rates 29 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander offender rates are expressed per 100,000 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population aged 10 years or over. The offender rates presented in this issue for the 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11 reference periods are derived from Series B projections of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population from the ABS Experimental Estimates and Projections, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, 1991 to 2021 (cat. no. 3238.0). These projections are based on data from the 2006 Census of Population and Housing and supersede the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander projections data used for the calculation of offender rates in the 2007-08 issue of this publication, which are based on 2001 Census of Population and Housing data. 30 Series B is one of two main projection series (Series A and B) that have been published for the years 2007 to 2021. Both of these series assume an annual decline of 0.5% in fertility rates; an annual increase of 1% in paternity rates; constant interstate migration at levels observed in the 2006 Census; and zero net overseas migration with no arrivals and no departures. Two different assumptions were made about future Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander life expectancy at birth for Australia:
31 Rates for the non-Indigenous population are calculated using the total ERP of persons aged 10 years and over for each state or territory minus the projected Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population aged 10 years and over. Age standardisation of offender rates 32 Age standardisation is a statistical method that adjusts crude rates to account for age differences between study populations. 33 There are differences in the age distributions between Australia's Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous populations, with the former having a much younger population. In 2001, the proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 18 years and over was 55%, compared with 76% of non-Indigenous people (and 75% of the total Australian population). The diagram below illustrates the differences in age distributions. 34 ESTIMATED RESIDENT POPULATION, AUSTRALIA - 30 JUNE 2001 35 Due to the differing age profiles, using crude rates to examine differences between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous populations may lead to erroneous conclusions being drawn about variables that are correlated with age. 36 By making comparisons across age groups, we know that offender rates decrease in older age groups, that is, that the offender rate is correlated with age. If we compare overall offender rates between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous persons, it is likely that the offender rate in the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population will be higher because of the larger proportion of young people in the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population. 37 Age standardised Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous offender rates have been presented in Table 3.9 of this publication. Ratios of the rates are also included in this table. The standard population against which each population is age standardised is the total Australian Estimated Resident Population at 30 June 2001. The standard population is revised every ten years; the next revision will be based on data from the 2011 Census of Population and Housing. ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER OFFENDERS 38 This publication presents data about Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander offenders only for New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia and the Northern Territory for 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11. Based on ABS assessment, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander data for offenders for other jurisdictions are not of sufficient quality and/or do not meet ABS standards for self-identification for national reporting in 2010-11. 39 As the Indigenous status of an offender is based on self-identification by the individual who comes into contact with police, Indigenous identification is difficult to ascertain where police proceed by way of a summons, and/or a penalty/infringement notice as these methods do not usually provide an opportunity for police to ask individuals to self-identify. The proportion of offenders proceeded against by police by way of a penalty/infringement notice during 2010-11 was:
40 To address the issue of high levels of 'not stated' Indigenous status due to the relatively high proportions of offenders proceeded against by a penalty notice, Indigenous status data in this publication for all four available states and territories exclude those offenders who were proceeded against by a penalty/infringement notice. The impacts on the overall proportion of offenders with a 'not stated' Indigenous status for 2010-11 data were as follows:
41 Note: the proportion of offenders with a 'not stated' Indigenous status varies by offence type. 42 The use of penalty/infringement notices by police is most prevalent for Public order offences, Illicit drug offences, Offences against justice and Miscellaneous offences. The removal of those offenders who were primarily proceeded against via a penalty/infringement notice resulted in reduced offender counts and rates for these four offence divisions. Total Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander counts and rates are also affected slightly due to the loss of some offender counts for those penalty/infringment notices where there was a known Indigenous status. DATA COMPARABILITY 43 National offender statistics are compiled in order to maximise comparability across states and territories. This collection has been designed to facilitate comparisons of states and territories through the application of common national statistical standards and counting rules. However, some legislative and processing differences remain. The following information highlights those processes unique to a jurisdiction that may have had an impact on the data for this collection. This may include differences in recording practices, legislation or policy to combat particular types of crime. New South Wales 44 Criminal Infringement Notices (CINs) have been implemented in NSW since 1 November 2007. NSW Police have an additional option to issue CINs for certain offences such as stealing, offensive behaviour, offensive language, unlawful entry of a vehicle/boat, obstruct traffic and goods in custody. As a result of the use of CINs, non-court actions have increased each year. 45 From December 2008, Official Warnings under the Young Offenders Act 1987 are recorded as Legal Actions (Warning YOA) with the use of lawpart codes that enable direct coding to ANZSOC. Data for 2008-09 includes Warning YOA since December 2008. These methods were excluded prior to this period. 46 Verbal Warning and Compliance Notice were two non-court proceedings included for the first time in 2009-10. They relate mainly to licensing enforcement (i.e. liquor, security industry, firearms). The Verbal Warning is a less formal process which informs the person that some breach(es) of regulations need to be corrected.The Compliance Notice is a written warning with a stipulated time period within which the breach(es) must be corrected. Victoria 47 Prior to 2009-10, data for most Victorian Penalty Infringement Notices (PINs) were not available, as data was collected and maintained by a third party rather than by Victoria Police. As a result, offender counts and rates for Victoria and Australia were underestimated. PINs data was supplied for the first time in the 2009-10 cycle for both 2008-09 and 2009-10 and was also provided for 2010-11. Caution should be used when comparing the 2009-10 and 2010-11 issues of this publication with previous issues. The inclusion of PINs data has had an impact over time with an increase from 21,210 proceedings in 2008-09 to 40,883 proceedings in 2010-11. 48 A trial Infringement Notice Project commenced in Victoria in July 2008 following the introduction of the Infringements and Other Acts Amendment Act 2008. This Act lists a number of additional offences which are able to be dealt with by way of an infringement notice by police. In addition, police have the ability to issue new official warning notices for most offences in the trial. This trial is ongoing. The offences include the following:
49 The Crimes (Family Violence) Act was repealed on the 8th December 2008 and replaced by the Family Violence Protection Act which allows for easier and broader prosecution of family violence orders, with expected associated increased in the number of breaches (ANZSOC Division 15). Queensland 50 For Public order offences, in comparison with other states and territories, Queensland Police make greater use of arrest, summons, cautions, and notices to appear as an action against an offender, and only limited use of infringement/penalty notices. This results in Queensland's police proceedings data having the highest proportion of overall proceedings which are police-initiated court proceedings despite seeing a small increase in 2010-11 in the number of penalty notices issued. 51 The issuing of infringement notices or 'e-ticketing' by Queensland Police for public nuisance offences commenced from 8 November 2010. These offences include: public nuisance, public urination, obstruct police officer (in relation to the aforementioned public nuisance or public urination) and contravene requirement of a police officer (in relation to stating correct name and address regarding the above). 52 Queensland has a relatively high number of unique offenders with an unknown principal offence. This is due to the Queensland Police offender system containing reported offence details which are quite broad in their description, and where this occurs the offence may be deemed too broad to code to ANZSOC, resulting in it being listed as an unknown offence within ANZSOC. 53 Where an offender has co-occurring offences at the ANZSOC division level supplementary code for 0800 Theft and 0900 Fraud (which are unranked on the NOI), this may result in the misallocation of principal offence to Divisions 8 Theft or 9 Fraud and deception instead of being allocated an unknown principal offence. For further information about the allocation of principal offence, refer to paragraphs 13-15 of the Explanatory Notes. The level of miscoding is minor and not considered to be significant. South Australia 54 Caution should be exercised with counts of offenders and proceedings with a principal offence of Illicit drug offences for South Australia as the data are overstated. Data relating to offenders issued with Cannabis Expiation Notices (CENs) and drug diversions are stored on separate infringement databases and this information cannot be linked to other databases that store information about offenders who were proceeded against by police. As offenders cannot be linked across the databases, if an offender has committed an offence in addition to a CEN then that offender may be counted as two separate offenders (i.e. counted twice), which may result in an over count of the total number of offenders, rates and police proceedings for South Australia. Furthermore, Indigenous status data (via the Standard Indigenous Question) is not captured for drug diversions or CENs and are recorded as 'not stated'. 55 General Expiation Notices (GEN) may be issued for Public order offences and Offences against justice and are stored on an infringement database that cannot be linked with other police databases that contain information about offenders who were proceeded against by police. As a result, offenders with a principal offence of Public order offences or Offences against justice are overstated as an offender may be counted twice if they have committed an offence in addition to the GEN during the same reference period. Western Australia 56 Western Australia police utilise two separate offender recording systems for police purposes. The data for this collection is sourced from both systems. Data were successfully matched between the two systems to enable the production of offender counts and associated demographic and offence information. Data on police proceedings however could not be matched between these two systems resulting in an overestimate of the number of proceedings. Therefore, data about police proceedings are not published. This affects Tables 3.5, 3.6, 4.1 and 4.2 and has resulted in national data not being available for police proceedings and the number of times an offender is proceeded against by police. 57 In 2010-11, further improvements to the matching process for the two offender recording systems resulted in revisions to 2009-10 data and a minor reduction in the count of unique offenders for that year. These improvements did not extend to data on police proceedings. Tasmania 58 During 2009-10, legislation that was introduced in 2007 relating to the consumption of legal substances in regulated spaces was expanded to include a greater area of public space. Additional infringement notices and/or cautions were issued during this period, resulting in an increase in Public order offences between 2008-09 and 2009-10. 59 Additional infringement notices relating to a range of offences coded to Miscellaneous offences (ANZSOC Division 16) were made available during 2009-10 for both the 2008-09 and 2009-10 reference periods. These included a range of regulatory fishing, recreational boating, and littering offences. In 2009-10, a change of focus in enforcing a range of different offences resulted in a reduction in the issuing of infringement notices for some offence types. 60 Benchmarking of Liquor Infringement Notices for the first time in 2010-11 resulted in an increase in Public order offences between 2009-10 and 2010-11. This follows an increase in Public order offences between 2008-09 and 2009-10 due to the increasing use of Liquor Infringement Notices by Tasmanian police. 61 In December 2010, Tasmania introduced a new law of smoking in a smoke free area. This resulted in an increased use of penalty notices or penalty notices - cautions for Public order offences. 62 From April 4 2011, Tasmanian Police are only able to proceed against youth for minor drug offences under the Youth Justice Act 1997, rather than give Illicit Drug Diversion Initiative cautions and diversions. This resulted in an increased number of court actions for youth offenders for Illicit drug offences between 2009-10 and 2010-11. 63 Caution should be used when comparing 2009-10 and 2010-11 data to data from 2008-09 and to previous issues of this publication. For the Recorded Crime - Offenders 2010-11 cycle, Tasmania Police undertook a review of their ANZSOC mappings and implemented coding changes that impacted on principal offence information for the 2009-10 and 2010-11 reference periods. As a result, some ANZSOC divisions may no longer be comparable. Coding changes relating to significant data changes include:
Northern Territory 64 The introduction of new legislation in 2007 in the Northern Territory resulted in an increase in the count of offenders with a principal offence of Public order offences. This included the commencement of the Northern Territory Emergency Response (NTER) Act prohibiting alcohol in certain regions. New legislation implemented during 2008-09 targeting group criminal activities (i.e. riot and affray) also resulted in increased Public order charges. 65 The Northern Territory government has adopted a zero tolerance approach to antisocial behaviour and has introduced a broad range of new and innovative approaches to monitoring and responding to antisocial behaviour. The package of initiatives includes alcohol management and boosting alcohol and substance abuse services; return to country; patrols and engagement; increased amount of short term/crisis accommodation; CCTV; and youth programs. Northern Territory Police have developed proactive and targeted policing strategies and continues to focus patrols at hot spots during peak times where and when Public order offences occur. Northern Territory Police continue to work with the broader community through forums to address key public order issues. 66 Offence data for juvenile offenders are predominantly coded to an ANZSOC division level supplementary code (for example, 0800 Theft and related offences). A number of the ANZSOC division level supplementary codes are unranked on the National Offence Index (NOI). Where an offender has co-occurring offences coded to ANZSOC division level supplementary codes which are unranked on the NOI, this may result in misallocation of principal offence to an ANZSOC division (impacting on divisions 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 15) instead of being allocated an unknown principal offence. For further information about the allocation of principal offence, refer to paragraphs 13-15 of the Explanatory Notes. The level of miscoding is minor and not considered to be significant. 67 There is a small proportion of offenders that come into contact with police who are unable to provide their exact date of birth. In these situations, where only a birth year is provided, police may allocate a nominal birth date or alternatively, police may record the offenders date of birth as unknown. Australian Capital Territory 68 A number of policing strategies in the Australian Capital Territory have resulted in fewer people being proceeded against for 'breach of the peace' or 'intoxication'. The use of 'move on' powers and 'sobering up' shelters have contributed to a decline in Public order offences from 2007-08. 69 The issuing of Criminal Infringement Notices (CINs) was introduced on the 24th December 2009. CINs may be issued for a range of public order/minor street offences, including defacing premises (private property), defacing premises (public property), urinating in public, fail to comply with noise abatement direction and consume liquor in prescribed public place. The use of CINs is aimed at having an immediate deterrent effect on an offender while providing an alternative to court action. These offences are not recorded on the primary Australian Capital Territory police recording system and are not currently available. As a result, Australian Capital Territory data are understated for Public order offences. REVISIONS 70 Revised data for 2009-10 was received from two jurisdictions - Western Australia and Tasmania - during the preparation of this publication. Revisions received from both Western Australia and Tasmania had minimal impact on the data (refer to paragraph 57 for Western Australia and paragraph 64 for Tasmania). The revisions related to ongoing quality improvement work in Western Australia and updated data and quality improvements in Tasmania. COMPARISONS TO OTHER ABS DATA Recorded Crime - Victims 71 There are strong links between victims and offenders recorded by police in their administrative systems. Once a victim is recorded by police an investigation may ensue which could result, although not always, in an offender being proceeded against by police. However, a number of limitations exist between the Recorded Crime - Offenders collection and the Recorded Crime - Victims collection:
72 Despite these differences, broad comparisons can be made between the two collections. 73 For more detailed information about data comparability in relation to the Recorded Crime - Victims collection and more generally about using administrative and survey data, refer to the information paper, Measuring Victims of Crime: A Guide to Using Administrative and Survey Data, June 2011 (cat. no. 4500.0.55.001). 74 For more information about the Recorded Crime - Victims collection, refer to Recorded Crime - Victims, Australia (cat. no. 4510.0). Criminal Courts 75 Data relating to the number of police-initiated court proceedings are not strictly comparable to the number of defendants sourced from the Criminal Courts collection. Not all court related actions initiated by police will proceed to a criminal court as police proceedings may be withdrawn or changed to other legal actions during the course of an investigation. Furthermore, a defendant appearing in a criminal court in Australia may be prosecuted via charges initiated by authorities other than police. There will also be lags between when the police initiate action via a court method of proceeding and when a criminal court finalises a defendants' case. In most cases the offender counts should be higher than defendant counts, however this may not be the case for all offence types due to charges laid by other authorities. For more information about criminal courts refer to Criminal Courts, Australia (cat. no. 4513.0). CONFIDENTIALITY 76 Table cells containing small values have been randomly adjusted to avoid releasing confidential information. Due to the randomisation process, totals may vary slightly across tables. ADDITIONAL DATA 77 A set of supplementary tables containing extra state and territory data are available on the ABS web site (see Appendix 1 for a list of available tables). Special tabulations may be able to be produced on request to meet individual user requirements. For further information contact the National Centre for Crime and Justice Statistics by email at <crime.justice@abs.gov.au> or the contact person listed on the front cover of this publication. RELATED PUBLICATIONS ABS publications 78 Other ABS publications which may be of interest include:
79 Current publications and other products released by the ABS are available from the ABS web site <https://www.abs.gov.au>. The ABS web site includes a release calendar detailing products to be released in the next six months. The National Centre for Crime and Justice Statistics within the ABS releases Crime and Justice News (cat. no. 4500.0), an annual newsletter that is published on the ABS web site. The National Centre for Crime and Justice Statistics can be contacted by email at <crime.justice@abs.gov.au>. Non-ABS publications 80 Non-ABS sources which may be of interest include:
Document Selection These documents will be presented in a new window.
|
||