APPENDIX 1 LIST OF SUPPLEMENTARY DATA CUBES
HIGHER COURTS SUPPLEMENTARY DATA CUBES
1. Defendants finalised, Method of finalisation and principal offence by states and territories
2. Defendants adjudicated, Method of finalisation and principal offence, 2001-02 to 2008-09
3. Defendants adjudicated, Sex and principal offence by states and territories
4. Defendants adjudicated, Sex and age by states and territories
5. Defendants adjudicated, Principal offence by age and sex
6. Defendants adjudicated, Sex and principal offence by adjudication type
7. Defendants adjudicated, Sex by principal offence, 2001-02 to 2008-09
8. Defendants proven guilty, Principal offence and principal sentence by states and territories
9. Defendants proven guilty, Principal offence by principal sentence, 2001-02 to 2008-09
10. Defendants proven guilty, Sex and principal sentence by states and territories
11. Defendants proven guilty, Sex and principal offence by principal sentence
12. Duration from initiation to finalisation, Method of finalisation by states and territories
13. Duration from initiation to finalisation, Method of finalisation by principal offence, 2001-02 to 2008-09
14. Defendants proven guilty, Sexual assault and related offences by principal sentence, 2006-07 to 2008-09
MAGISTRATES' COURTS SUPPLEMENTARY DATA CUBES
1. Defendants finalised, Method of finalisation and principal offence by states and territories
2. Defendants adjudicated, Method of finalisation and principal offence, 2003-04 to 2008-09
3. Defendants adjudicated, Sex and principal offence by states and territories
4. Defendants adjudicated, Sex and age by states and territories
5. Defendants adjudicated, Principal offence by age and sex
6. Defendants adjudicated, Sex by principal offence, 2003-04 to 2008-09
7. Defendants proven guilty, Selected principal offence and principal sentence by states and territories
8. Defendants proven guilty, Principal offence and principal sentence, 2003-04 to 2008-09
9. Defendants proven guilty, Sex and principal sentence by states and territories
10. Defendants proven guilty, Sex and principal offence by principal sentence
11. Duration from initiation to finalisation, Method of finalisation by states and territories
12. Duration from initiation to finalisation, Method of finalisation by principal offence, 2003-04 to 2008-09
13. Defendants adjudicated for road traffic offences, Summary characteristics
CHILDREN'S COURTS SUPPLEMENTARY DATA CUBES
1. Defendants finalised, Method of finalisation and principal offence by states and territories
2. Defendants adjudicated, Method of finalisation and principal offence, 2006-07 to 2008-09
3. Defendants adjudicated, Sex and principal offence by states and territories
4. Defendants adjudicated, Sex and age by states and territories
5. Defendants adjudicated, Principal offence by age and sex
6. Defendants adjudicated, Sex by principal offence, 2006-07 to 2008-09
7. Defendants adjudicated, Age by principal offence, 2006-07 to 2008-09
8. Defendants proven guilty, Principal offence and principal sentence by states and territories
9. Defendants proven guilty, Principal offence and principal sentence, 2006-07 to 2008-09
10. Defendants proven guilty, Sex and principal sentence by states and territories
11. Defendants proven guilty, Age and principal sentence by states and territories
12. Defendants proven guilty, Sex and principal offence by principal sentence
13. Duration from initiation to finalisation, Method of finalisation by states and territories
14. Duration from initiation to finalisation, Method of finalisation by principal offence, 2006-07 to 2008-09
ESTIMATED IMPACT OF CLASSIFICATION CHANGES DATA CUBES
1. Estimated impact of classification changes, 2008-09 Higher Courts defendants finalised, New South Wales
2. Estimated impact of classification changes, 2008-09 Higher Courts defendants finalised, Queensland
3. Estimated impact of classification changes, 2008-09 Higher Courts defendants finalised, South Australia
4. Estimated impact of classification changes, 2008-09 Higher Courts defendants finalised, Western Australia
5. Estimated impact of classification changes, 2008-09 Higher Courts defendants finalised, Tasmania
6. Estimated impact of classification changes, 2008-09 Higher Courts defendants finalised, Northern Territory
7. Estimated impact of classification changes, 2008-09 Higher Courts defendants finalised, Australian Capital Territory
8. Estimated impact of classification changes, 2008-09 Magistrates' Courts defendants finalised, New South Wales
9. Estimated impact of classification changes, 2008-09 Magistrates' Courts defendants finalised, Queensland
10. Estimated impact of classification changes, 2008-09 Magistrates' Courts defendants finalised, South Australia
11. Estimated impact of classification changes, 2008-09 Magistrates' Courts defendants finalised, Western Australia
12. Estimated impact of classification changes, 2008-09 Magistrates' Courts defendants finalised, Tasmania
13. Estimated impact of classification changes, 2008-09 Magistrates' Courts defendants finalised, Northern Territory
14. Estimated impact of classification changes, 2008-09 Children's Courts defendants finalised, New South Wales
15. Estimated impact of classification changes, 2008-09 Children's Courts defendants finalised, Queensland
16. Estimated impact of classification changes, 2008-09 Children's Courts defendants finalised, South Australia
17. Estimated impact of classification changes, 2008-09 Children's Courts defendants finalised, Western Australia
18. Estimated impact of classification changes, 2008-09 Children's Courts defendants finalised, Tasmania
19. Estimated impact of classification changes, 2008-09 Children's Courts defendants finalised, Northern Territory
Quality Declaration 
Print Page
Print All