4530.0 - Crime Victimisation, Australia, 2012-13 Quality Declaration 
ARCHIVED ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 12/02/2014   
   Page tools: Print Print Page Print all pages in this productPrint All

Please install or enable flash on you browser.

Get Adobe Flash Player

VICTIMISATION EXPERIENCES IN THE NORTHERN TERRITORY Endnote 1, Endnote 2, Endnote 3

PERSONAL CRIME (see Data cube 2, Table 4)

Physical assault

An estimated 6,400 people in the Northern Territory (4.6%) experienced physical assault in the 12 months prior to interview. Of these, 3,100 (48%) reported the most recent incident to police.

Just over a third of all victims of physical assault in the Northern Territory experienced a single incident (36% or 2,300 persons).

Face-to-face threatened assault

An estimated 5,600 people in the Northern Territory (4.0%) experienced face-to-face threatened assault in the 12 months prior to interview. This was less than the rate of face-to-face threatened assault found in the 2008-09 survey (7.6%).

Threatened assault (includes face-to-face and non face-to-face threatened assault)

An estimated 5,800 people in the Northern Territory (4.1%)endnote 4 experienced threatened assault in the 12 months prior to interview.

Assault (includes physical assault and both types of threatened assault)

An estimated 10,900 people in the Northern Territory (7.7%)endnote 4 experienced assault in the 12 months prior to interview. Of these, a third experienced a single incident (33% or 3,600 persons).

HOUSEHOLD CRIME (see Data cube 2, Table 5)

Break-in

An estimated 5,500 households in the Northern Territory (7.9%) were victims of break-in during the 12 months prior to interview. Of these, 4,000 (74%) had the most recent incident reported to police.

Attempted break-in

An estimated 2,500 households in the Northern Territory (3.6%) were victims of attempted break-in during the 12 months prior to interview. This was less than the rate of attempted break-in found in the 2008-09 survey (8.1%).

Motor vehicle theft

An estimated 1,000 households in the Northern Territory (1.4%) were victims of motor vehicle theft in the 12 months prior to interview.

Theft from motor vehicle

An estimated 2,500 households in the Northern Territory (3.6%) were victims of theft from a motor vehicle in the 12 months prior to interview. This was less than the rate of theft from a motor vehicle found in the 2008-09 survey (7.9%).

Of the victims in 2012-13, 1,400 (56%) had the most recent incident reported to police.

Malicious property damage

An estimated 6,000 households in the Northern Territory (8.7%) were victims of malicious property damage. This was less than the rate of malicious property damage found in the 2008-09 survey (20%).

Of the victims in 2012-13, 3,600 (60%) had the most recent incident reported to police.

Other theft

An estimated 2,300 households in the Northern Territory (3.3%) were victims of other theft in the 12 months prior to interview. This was less than the rate of other theft found in the 2008-09 survey (8.2%).

Graph Image for VICTIMISATION RATES(a), Selected household crimes, Northern Territory, 2008-09 and 2012-13

Footnote(s): (a) The number of households experiencing a household crime, expressed as a percentage of the total number of households.

Source(s): Crime Victimisation, Australia



Graph Image for REPORTING RATES(a), Selected household crimes, Northern Territory, 2008-09 and 2012-13

Footnote(s): (a) The total number of households that had the most recent incident of the household crime reported to police, expressed as a percentage of all households experiencing the household crime. The incident may have been reported by any member of the household or another person.

Source(s): Crime Victimisation, Australia




ENDNOTES
1 Data for robbery and sexual assault in the Northern Territory are not discussed as there is a high relative standard error (RSE) associated with the estimated number of victims who experienced these offences in the Northern Territory (see Data cube 1, Table 2a).

2 All comparisons discussed have been tested for statistical significance with a 95% level of confidence that there is a real difference between the two populations being tested. Only data with a relative standard error (RSE) of less than 25% is referred to in the text of this publication. For further information, refer to the Technical Note.

3 The comparison of 2012-13 data with 2008-09 data reflects changes between these two time points only and is not necessarily indicative of any annual movements within the intervening period.

4 This number is not published in the accompanying tables, but can be obtained by dividing the number of victims of a selected crime type by the relevant population total (in this case, the total population of people over the age of 15 in Northern Territory).