4513.0 - Criminal Courts, Australia, 2015-16 Quality Declaration 
ARCHIVED ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 02/03/2017   
   Page tools: Print Print Page Print all pages in this productPrint All

Please install or enable flash on you browser.

Get Adobe Flash Player


TASMANIA

DEFENDANTS FINALISED

Tasmanian Criminal Courts finalised 13,373 defendants in 2015–16, a decrease of 1% (115) compared with 2014–15. In contrast, the number of defendants finalised nationally increased by 3% (14,592) over the same period. (Tables 1 and 35)

Graph Image for NUMBER OF DEFENDANTS FINALISED, Tasmania, 2011-12 to 2015-16

Source(s): Criminal Courts, Australia


Defendants finalised in Tasmania accounted for 2% of defendants finalised in Australian state and territory criminal courts in 2015–16. (Table 2)

Tasmania accounted for 3% of offenders proceeded against by police in Australia in 2015–16. (Table 6 in the 2015–16 issue of Recorded Crime – Offenders, Australia (cat. no. 4519.0))

PRINCIPAL OFFENCE

The three most common principal offences for defendants finalised in Tasmania in 2015–16 were:
  • Traffic and vehicle regulatory offences (43% or 5,790);
  • Acts intended to cause injury (15% or 1,959); and
  • Offences against justice procedures, government security and government operations (8% or 1,108).

The largest decreases in the number of defendants finalised between 2014–15 and 2015–16 occurred for the following principal offences:
  • Public order offences (16% or 113);
  • Traffic and vehicle regulatory offences (2% or 97); and
  • Theft and related offences (5% or 53). (Table 35)

Graph Image for NUMBER OF DEFENDANTS FINALISED, Public order offences, Tasmania, 2011-12 to 2015-16

Source(s): Criminal Courts, Australia


METHOD OF FINALISATION

The number of defendants finalised that were proven guilty in Tasmania in 2015–16 was 11,016. This represented an increase of 2% (166) compared with 2014–15. This was driven by an increase in guilty plea by defendant (4% or 387) and partially offset by decreases in guilty ex-parte (23% or 189) and guilty finding by court (6% or 31). The number of defendants finalised who were acquitted decreased by 14% (276) compared with 2014–15. (Table 35)

Tasmania had the highest proportion of defendants finalised that were acquitted among the state and territories (13% or 1,713) and the lowest proportion of defendants finalised who were withdrawn by prosecution (2% or 308) in 2015–16. (Table 2)

PRINCIPAL SENTENCE

Four in five (80% or 8,772) defendants proven guilty were sentenced to a non-custodial order while one in five (20% or 2,239) defendants proven guilty were sentenced to a custodial order in 2015–16.

The number of defendants finalised that were sentenced to custodial orders increased by 16% (306) compared with 2014–15, while the number sentenced to non-custodial orders decreased by 2% (145) over the same time period. (Table 35)

Graph Image for NUMBER OF DEFENDANTS FINALISED, Custodial and Non-custodial Orders, Tasmania, 2011-12 to 2015-16

Source(s): Criminal Courts, Australia


The increase in custodial orders was driven by a rise in the number of defendants finalised that were sentenced to custody in a correctional institution (24% or 186) and fully suspended sentence (10% or 113) compared with 2014–15. (Table 8 in the 2015–16 issue; Table 7 in the 2014–15 issue)

OTHER KEY POINTS

In 2015–16:
  • Compared to 2014–15, the proportion of defendants finalised in the Magistrates’ Court (92% or 12,298), Children’s Court (5% or 658) and Higher Court (3% or 423) remained unchanged; (Table 35)
  • Young defendants (aged 10-19 years) comprised 10% (1,327) of defendants finalised; (Tables 2 and 35)
  • Just over three-quarters (76% or 10,172) of defendants finalised in 2015–16 were male, while 24% (3,181) were female and less than 1% (30) were organisations; (Table 35) and
  • Excluding the Tasmanian Higher courts, the median sentence length for those sentenced to custody in a correctional institution was 4 months and for community service orders was 50 hours. The median amount given to defendants sentenced to a fine was $350. (Tables 48d, 49 and 50)