4524.0 - In Focus: Crime and Justice Statistics, June 2013  
ARCHIVED ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 19/06/2013   
   Page tools: Print Print Page Print all pages in this productPrint All  
Contents >> Scams >> Geographical Residence

Please install or enable flash on you browser.

Get Adobe Flash Player


GEOGRAPHICAL RESIDENCE

The proportion of people exposed to at least one scam varied across the states and territories, with the proportion of people exposed in Tasmania (40.8%) and the Australian Capital Territory (39.5%) both higher than the proportion nationally (35.8%).

The likelihood of being exposed to a scam also varied between different geographical regions. People residing in outer regional areas were less likely than the general population to be exposed to at least one scam (32.7% compared to 35.8%). Of the different types of scams, people in an outer regional area were less likely to be exposed to a fake notification or offer from a bank or financial institution (13.4% compared to 15.8%), and people living in remote areas were less likely to be exposed to an invitation into a pyramid selling scheme than the general population (4.0% compared to 6.2%).

Graph Image for Proportion of people exposed to selected scams by remoteness areas




Previous PageNext Page