4530.0 - Crime Victimisation, Australia, 2012-13 Quality Declaration 
ARCHIVED ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 12/02/2014   
   Page tools: Print Print Page Print all pages in this productPrint All

Please install or enable flash on you browser.

Get Adobe Flash Player

VICTIMISATION EXPERIENCES IN THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORYEndnote 1, Endnote 2, Endnote 3

PERSONAL CRIME (see Data cube 2, Table 4)

Physical assault

An estimated 7,700 people in the Australian Capital Territory (2.6%) experienced physical assault in the 12 months prior to interview in 2012-13.

Face-to-face threatened assault

An estimated 10,100 people in the Australian Capital Territory (3.4%) experienced face-to-face threatened assault in the 12 months prior to interview in 2012-13.

Threatened assault (includes face-to-face and non face-to-face threatened assault)

An estimated 10,700 people in the Australian Capital Territory (3.6%)endnote 4 experienced threatened assault in the 12 months prior to interview in 2012-13.

Assault (includes physical assault and both types of threatened assault)

An estimated 16,500 people in the Australian Capital Territory (5.6%)endnote 4 experienced assault in the 12 months prior to interview in 2012-13.

Half of all victims of assault experienced a single incident (51% or 8,300 persons).

HOUSEHOLD CRIME (see Data cube 2, Table 5)

Break-in

An estimated 4,100 households in the Australian Capital Territory (2.8%) were victims of break-in in the 12 months prior to interview in 2012-13. Of these, 3,000 (73%) had the most recent incident reported to police.

Attempted break-in

An estimated 3,500 households in the Australian Capital Territory (2.4%) were victims of attempted break-in in the 12 months prior to interview in 2012-13.

Theft from motor vehicle

An estimated 3,600 households in the Australian Capital Territory (2.5%) were victims of theft from a motor vehicle in the 12 months prior to interview in 2012-13. This was less than the estimated victims of theft from a motor vehicle in both 2011-12 (4.3% or 5,900 households) and 2008-09 (5.1% or 6,800 households).

Of the victims in 2012-13, 2,200 (59%) had the most recent incident reported to police.

Other theft

An estimated 3,600 households in the Australian Capital Territory (2.5%) were victims of other theft in the 12 months prior to interview in 2012-13. This was less than the rate of other theft found in the 2008-09 survey (5.3%).

Malicious property damage

An estimated 10,400 households in the Australian Capital Territory (7.2%) were victims of malicious property damage in the 12 months prior to interview in 2012-13. This was less than the victims of malicious property damage in 2008-09 (15% or 20,300 households).

Of the victims in 2012-13, 4,800 (46%) had the most recent incident reported to police.

Graph Image for VICTIMISATION RATES(a), Selected household crimes, Australian Capital Territory, 2008-09 and 2012-13

Footnote(s): (a) The number of households experiencing a household crime, expressed as a percentage of the total number of households.

Source(s): Crime Victimisation, Australia



Graph Image for REPORTING RATES(a), Selected household crimes, Australian Capital Territory, 2008-09 and 2012-13

Footnote(s): (a) The total number of households that had the most recent incident of the household crime reported to police, expressed as a percentage of all households experiencing the household crime. The incident may have been reported by any member of the household or another person.

Source(s): Crime Victimisation, Australia




ENDNOTES

1 Data for non face-to-face threatened assault, robbery, sexual assault, and motor vehicle theft in the Australian Capital Territory are not discussed as there is a high relative standard error (RSE) associated with the estimated number of victims who experienced these offences in the Australian Capital Territory (see Data cube 1, Tables 2a and 3a).

2 All comparisons discussed have been tested for statistical significance with a 95% level of confidence that there is a real difference between the two populations being tested. Only data with a relative standard error (RSE) of less than 25% is referred to in the text of this publication. For further information, refer to the Technical Note.

3 The comparison of 2012-13 data with 2008-09 data reflects changes between these two time points only and is not necessarily indicative of any annual movements within the intervening period.

4 This number is not published in the accompanying tables, but can be obtained by dividing the number of victims of a selected crime type by the relevant population total (in this case, the total population of people over the age of 15 in Australian Capital Territory).