Page tools:
![]() ![]() | ||
|
NON-SAMPLING ERROR 2 The main sources of non-sampling error are response errors and non-response bias. These may occur in any enumeration whether it is a full count or a sample. 3 Response errors include errors on the part of both respondents and interviewers. These reporting errors may arise through inappropriate wording of questions, misunderstanding of what data are required, inability or unwillingness to provide accurate information, and mistakes in answers to questions. 4 Non-response bias arises because the persons for whom no response is available may have different characteristics in relation to labour market behaviour than persons who responded in the survey. 5 Non-sampling errors are difficult to quantify in any collection. However, every effort is made to minimise these errors in the LFS by careful design of questionnaires, intensive training and supervision of interviewers and efficient operating procedures. Non-response bias is minimised by call-backs to those households which do not respond, and is compensated for in the estimation process. 6 There are a number of other issues associated with collecting information from Indigenous persons in communities in remote areas. Although special procedures are used in some Indigenous communities, there may still be some cultural and practical difficulties in applying standard labour force concepts in these communities. Operational issues include the high turnover of trained interviewers in remote areas, the seasonal fluctuations in population numbers as well as in employment opportunities, and high population mobility. 7 Responses in the LFS may be given by any responsible adult in each selected household. Reporting errors may arise when the respondent provides information for another member of the household without being fully aware of their labour force details. Although this is a minor issue for the survey in general, the higher mobility of Indigenous household members may affect the reporting on details such as active job search or availability for work. SAMPLING ERROR 15 This formula is only valid when x is a subset of y. EXAMPLES OF CALCULATIONS Level standard errors 16 As an example of the calculation and use of standard errors, consider the estimate of 147,400 Indigenous persons employed in 2005. The standard error for this estimate is 5,900 (see Table L1). This indicates that there are about two chances in three that the true value (the number that would have been obtained if the whole population had been included in the survey) is within the range 141,500 to 153,300 (that is 147,400 + or - 5,900). There are about 19 chances in 20 that the true value is in the range 135,600 to 159,200 (that is 147,400 + or - 11,800). Movement standard errors 17 Standard errors can also be used to interpret the reliability of annual movement estimates. For example, in 2004 there were an estimated 60,600 Indigenous females in employment, increasing to 65,000 in 2005 (a movement of 4,400). The associated standard error for the movement estimate is 3,500 (see Table M1) . This indicates that there are two chances in three that the true value of the movement is within the range 900 to 7,900 (that is 4,400 + or - 3,500). There are about 19 chances in 20 that the true value is in the range -2,600 to 11,400 (that is 4,400 + or - 7,000). Differences between estimates 18 Published estimates may also be used to calculate the difference between two survey estimates (numbers or percentages). Such an estimate is subject to sampling error. The sampling error of the difference between two estimates depends on their SEs and the relationship (correlation) between them. An approximate SE of the difference between two estimates (x-y) may be calculated by the following formula: 19 While this formula will only be exact for differences between separate and uncorrelated characteristics or subpopulations, it is expected to provide a good approximation for all differences likely to be of interest in this publication. 20 For example, in 2005, the participation rate of Indigenous males was 65.7%, 16.9 percentage points higher than the rate of 48.7% for Indigenous females. The standard error of the difference between these two estimates can be calculated as follows: Document Selection These documents will be presented in a new window.
|