4102.0 - Australian Social Trends, 1997
ARCHIVED ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 19/06/1997
Page tools: Print Page Print All | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Housing and Lifestyle: Youth housing PROPORTION OF YOUNG PEOPLE LIVING WITH THEIR PARENTS, 1996 Source: Labour Force Survey (unpublished data).
Living arrangements In 1996, 64% of all young people were living with their parents. However, there were quite different patterns of independence within this broad age group. The proportion of young people living with their parents decreased steadily with age, from 99% of those aged 15 years to 31% of those aged 24 years. In 1996, young people aged 15-19 predominantly lived with their parents. Only 11% of people in this age group had left to form their own households. Of these, 65% lived with unrelated people in group households, and 21% lived with a partner, with or without children. However, 51% of young people aged 20-24 had formed their own households. Of these 43% lived with unrelated people in group households, and 40% lived with a partner, with or without children. For both age groups of young people living away from their parents, the most common form of household was a group household. For young people who have not yet formed their own family, a group household provides the economic advantage of shared costs. Moreover, 59% of group households contained only two people. LIVING ARRANGEMENTS OF YOUNG PEOPLE, 1996
Source: Labour Force Status and Other Characteristics of Families, Australia (cat. no. 6224.0) Housing tenure and type In 1994, 6% of the 6.7 million households in Australia were young households. 66% of these households were private renters and 6% were public renters. Relatively few young households were home purchasers (16%), reflecting the time taken to save a housing loan deposit, and also the lifestyle priorities of this age group. The tenure type of young households was related to the family type of those households and their life-cycle stage. In 1994, 34% of young couple-only households and 32% of two-parent households were purchasing their own home, compared with 10% of lone-person households, and 8% of one-parent households. The differences are partly explained by the lower income levels of lone-person and one-parent households. Young households are more likely than older households to live in medium or high density housing. In 1994, 52% of young households were living in separate houses, 16% in semi-detached, row or terrace houses, or townhouses, and 32% in flats, units or apartments. In comparison, 81% of older households were living in separate houses, 7% in semi-detached, row or terrace houses, or townhouses, and 11% in flats, units or apartments. TENURE TYPE OF YOUNG HOUSEHOLDS, 1994
(b) Includes other tenure types. Source: Australian Housing Survey (unpublished data). Barriers to private renting With two thirds of young households in the private rental market, barriers to renting may have significant impacts on young people. Some landlords and agents may have negative perceptions about young people, especially young groups wishing to share accommodation1. In 1994, 8% of young renters reported that they had been refused rental accommodation. Of those, 32% were refused rental accommodation because of their age, 17% were refused because they had no references, 11% because they were seeking to rent as a group, and 8% because they were students. Housing affordability There is no single standard measure of housing affordability. One measure used in housing research is the ratio of housing costs to income2. Under this measure households are considered to have affordability problems if their income is relatively low (the bottom 40% of the household income distribution) and they spend more than 30% of their income on housing costs. In 1994, 31% of low income households spent more than 30% of their gross weekly incomes on housing. However, young households with low incomes were more likely than older households with low incomes to have affordability problems (53% compared to 29%). There were relatively few young low income households purchasing their homes (9,600). The majority of these (88%) spent more than 30% of their gross weekly income on housing, compared to 67% of older low income households who were purchasing their homes. Older households could be expected to have greater ability to meet mortgage repayments. Of households in the lowest two quintiles, fewer young households (63%) than older households (77%) in private rental experienced housing affordability problems. This may reflect the greater proportion of young households that are group households. LOW INCOME HOUSEHOLDS WHO SPENT MORE THAN 30% OF THEIR GROSS WEEKLY INCOME ON HOUSING, 1994
Source: Australian Housing Survey (unpublished data). Housing conditions Dwellings occupied by young households suffered from a greater number of physical problems than those occupied by older households. Young people were much more likely to be renting, and in general rental households experienced more problems. In 1994, 19% of young households reported no problems, compared with 27% of older households. 21% of young households reported five or more problems, while only 11% of older households reported five or more problems. Proportionally more young households were troubled by problems with water supply, mould/mildew, and leaks/water penetration (22%, 26%, and 16% respectively), than older households (14%, 17%, and 9% respectively). Young households were twice as likely to report problems with doors and security and one third more likely to report problems with draughts and windows, than older households. PROBLEMS WITH DWELLINGS, 1994
Source: Australian Housing Survey (unpublished data). Satisfaction with location An important factor in housing suitability is location, especially in terms of access to work and services. In 1994, 87% of young households said they were satisfied with the location of their dwelling. Only 2% were dissatisfied, while 11% were undecided. Young people living in semi-detached, row or terrace houses, or townhouses, and flats, units or apartments were more likely to be satisfied with the location of their dwelling (around 91%) than those living in separate houses (84%). This may be because separate houses are less likely to be located in areas with good access to public transport, and close to the work, educational, and entertainment needs of young households. In 1994, young households that were public renters were least likely to be satisfied with their dwelling's location. Only 68% of young public renters reported satisfaction with their dwelling's location, compared to 76% of young owners, 93% of young purchasers, and 89% of young private renters. Older households living in public housing were more likely to report satisfaction with their dwelling's location (80%). This suggests that the location of public housing may be less suitable for young people. SATISFACTION WITH LOCATION REPORTED BY YOUNG HOUSEHOLDS, 1994
(b) Includes other dwelling types. (c) Includes other renters. (d) Includes other tenure types. Source: Australian Housing Survey (unpublished data). Endnotes 1 Maas, F. 1995, National Youth Housing Strategy Interim Report: Discussion Paper, Executive Summary, Department of Housing and Regional Development, Canberra. 2 National Housing Strategy 1992, The Affordability of Australian Housing, Issues Paper No. 2, AGPS, Canberra.
|