Page tools: Print Page Print All | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenditure: Community services sector
Growth in the sector In the four years to 1999-2000, total expenditure on community services activities increased by 32% to $12.6 billion. This expenditure also increased as a proportion of Australia’s Gross Domestic Product (from 1.9% to 2.0%). At the same time, the number of organisations and employees involved in the provision of community services increased by 15% and 7% respectively. However, growth was not consistent across the sector, with increases (or decreases) varying across types of organisations and the nature of the activity they were involved in. This variation partly reflects the changes in government funding and service delivery arrangements that continued to be implemented over the period. CHANGE IN THE COMMUNITY SERVICES SECTOR - 1995-1996 TO 1999-2000 (a) Change in employees from June 1996 to June 2000.Source: Community Services, Australia, 1999-2000, (ABS cat. no. 8696.0). Government organisations Between 1995-1996 and 1999-2000, expenditure by Government organisations on community services increased by 25%. While more than three-quarters of the $3.4 billion spent in 1999-2000 was spent on direct community services activities, most of the growth over the four-year period was due to an increase in Government expenditure on other community services activities. Expenditure on these activities more than tripled over the period (from $258 million to $806 million). While some of this increase reflects improvements in data quality, it also reflects the additional administration, monitoring and support costs associated with the purchasing of services rather than directly delivering them. This expenditure on other activities by Government organisations does not include funding to other community service organisations for service provision. GOVERNMENT COMMUNITY SERVICES ORGANISATIONS
(b) Volunteers for the month of June 2000. Source: Community Services, Australia, 1999-2000 (ABS cat. no. 8696.0). Also consistent with the scaling down of actual provision of community services by Government organisations,2 were changes in the number of employees in these organisations over the period. Between 1995-1996 and 1999-2000, the number of employees in Government community service organisations decreased by 13%. The numbers of employees involved in both direct and other activities declined (down 6% and 36% respectively). The comparatively large decrease in the number of employees involved in other activities, and the large increase in other expenditure, is likely to reflect the tendency by governments to contract out functions supporting community services facilities, such as catering and cleaning. Private organisations Private providers of community services include both For profit and Not for profit organisations. In terms of the level of expenditure, and numbers of employees and volunteers, Not for profit community services organisations tend to dominate the entire community services sector (i.e. Government and private organisations combined). In 1999-2000, private Not for profit organisations accounted for 56% of expenditure, 64% of employees and 93% of volunteers involved in community services activities. Further, between 1995-1996 and 1999-2000, Not for profit organisations experienced the strongest growth of all organisations in the community services sector, driving much of the growth in the sector overall. They experienced the largest growth in spending, reaching $7.1 billion in 1999-2000, an increase of 42% on 1995-1996 expenditure. In keeping with the continued privatisation of the provision of community services over the period, growth in expenditure by Not for profit community services organisations on direct activities was more than double that of other activities (47% and 20% respectively). Not for profit organisations also experienced an increase in number of employees between 1995-1996 and 1999-2000 (up by 21%). This growth reflected a 47% increase in the number of employees in direct services provision, which more than compensated for a decrease of 25% in employment in other activities. Volunteer participation is also vital to the operation of many Not for profit community services organisations.3 In June 2000, there were 128 volunteers for every 100 people employed by these organisations, representing an overall increase of 31% in volunteer numbers since June 1996. This is in keeping with the increased proportion of Australians generally participating in voluntary work over the period (see Australian Social Trends 2002, Voluntary work). PRIVATE COMMUNITY SERVICES ORGANISATIONS
(b) Volunteers for the month of June 2000. Source: Community Services, Australia, 1999-2000 (ABS cat. no. 8696.0). In contrast, between 1995-1996 and 1999-2000, For profit community services organisations experienced more modest growth in expenditure (up 13% to $2.1 billion), and a decrease in the number of employees. The decrease in the total number of employees was the result of a 70% decrease in the number of employees involved in other community services activities, to 4,300. This was partly offset by a 6% increase (to 60,100) in the number of employees involved in direct community services activities in For profit organisations. Direct community services activities In 1999-2000, expenditure on direct community services was concentrated on three main activities. Residential care and accommodation placement accounted for over half of spending on direct activities, followed by personal and social support (20% of direct activities expenditure), and child care (11%). However, foster care placement showed the largest growth in direct activities expenditure between 1995-1996 and 1999-2000, up 69%. Over the same period, spending on personal and social support services by the sector rose by 49%, a result of private organisations (both For profit and Not for profit) doubling their expenditure on this activity. EXPENDITURE ON DIRECT COMMUNITY SERVICES ACTIVITIES
1 O'Brien, J. 2000, 'Resignation, radicalism or realism? What role for non-government agencies in the changing context of child and family welfare?', Children Australia, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 4-9. 2 Kerr, L. and Savelsberg, H. 2001, 'The Community Service Sector in the Era of the Market Model: Facilitators of social change or servants of the State?', Just Policy, September 2001, No. 23, pp. 22-32. 3 Ohlin, J. 1998, Will Privatisation and Contracting Out Deliver Community Services?, Social Policy Group Research Paper 15, Parliamentary Library Web Pages <www.aph.gov.au/labrary/pubs/rp/1997/98rp15.htm>, accessed 29 August 2002.
|