![]() |
||
Australian Bureau of Statistics | ||
Relative Standard Error |
|
Measuring variability due to sampling and randomly adjustment RSE%( x ) =SE(x) / x * 100 SEs of proportions and percentages Proportions and percentages formed from the ratio of two estimates are also subject to sampling errors. The size of the error depends of the accuracy of both the numerator and denominator. A formula to approximate the RSE of a proportion is given below: RSE%( x/y ) =sqrt[RSE%(x)]2 - [RSE%(y)]2 Note - this formula only holds when the x is a subset of y. It should not be used if this is not the case i.e. estimates of 'rates' as opposed to proportions. Using this formula, the RSE of the estimated proportion or percentage will be lower than the RSE estimate of the numerator. Therefore an approximation for SEs of proportions or percentages may be derived by neglecting the RSE of the denominator i.e. obtaining the RSE of the number of persons corresponding to the numerator of the proportion or percentage and then applying this figure to the estimated proportion or percentage. This approach was adopted for the purposes of assigning the * or ** to indicate a 25% or 50% RSE threshold in publications from the NHS and NHSI. SEs may also be used to calculate SEs for the difference between two survey estimates (numbers or percentages). The sampling error of the difference between the two estimates depends on their individual SEs and the relationship (correlation) between them. An approximate SE of the difference between two estimates (x-y) may be calculated by the following formula: SE(x-y) =sqrt[SE(x)]2 +[SE(y)]2 While this formula will only be exact for differences between separate and uncorrelated characteristics of subpopulations, it is expected to provide a reasonable approximation for most differences likely to be of interest in relation to this survey. The imprecision due to sampling variability, which is measured by the SE, should not be confused with inaccuracies that may occur because of imperfections in reporting by respondents and recording by interviewers, and errors made in coding and processing data. Inaccuracies of this kind are referred to as non-sampling error, and they may occur in any enumeration, whether it be a full count or a sample. Every effort is made to reduce non-sampling error to a minimum by careful design of questionnaires, intensive training and supervision of interviewers, and efficient operating procedures. This page first published 27 September 2011
|
