6265.0 - Underemployed Workers, Australia, September 2012 Quality Declaration 
ARCHIVED ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 21/02/2013   
   Page tools: Print Print Page Print all pages in this productPrint All

TECHNICAL NOTE DATA QUALITY


INTRODUCTION

1 Estimates in this publication are based on information obtained from occupants of a sample of dwellings, and are subject to sampling variability. That is, they may differ from those estimates that would have been produced if all dwellings had been included in the survey. One measure of the likely difference is given by the standard error (SE), which indicates the extent to which an estimate might have varied by chance because only a sample of dwellings was included. There are about two chances in three (67%) that a sample estimate will differ by less than one SE from the number that would have been obtained if all dwellings had been included, and about 19 chances in 20 (95%) that the difference will be less than two SEs. Another measure of the likely difference is the relative standard error (RSE), which is obtained by expressing the SE as a percentage of the estimate.

2 Due to space limitations, it is impractical to print the SE of each estimate in the publication. Instead, a table of SEs is provided to determine the SE for an estimate from the size of that estimate ( see table T1). The SE table is derived from a mathematical model, referred to as the 'SE model', which is created using data from a number of past Labour Force Surveys. It should be noted that the SE model only gives an approximate value for the SE for any particular estimate, since there is some minor variation between SEs for different estimates of the same size.


CALCULATION OF STANDARD ERROR

3 An example of the calculation and the use of SEs in relation to estimates of persons is as follows. Table 4 shows the estimated number of female underemployed part-time workers was 457,700. Since this estimate is between 300,000 and 500,000, table T1 shows that the SE for Australia will lie between 6,650 and 8,350 and can be approximated by interpolation using the following general formula:

Equation: Equation 1 test 2012

4 Therefore, there are about two chances in three that the value that would have been produced if all dwellings had been included in the survey will fall within the range 449,700 to 465,700 and about 19 chances in 20 that the value will fall within the range 441,700 to 473,700. This example is illustrated in the following diagram.

Diagram: CALCULATION OF STANDARD ERROR

5 In general, the size of the SE increases as the size of the estimate increases. Conversely, the RSE decreases as the size of the estimate increases. Very small estimates are thus subject to such high RSEs that their value for most practical purposes is unreliable. In the tables in this publication, only estimates with RSEs of 25% or less are considered reliable for most purposes. Estimates with RSEs greater than 25% but less than or equal to 50% are preceded by an asterisk (e.g.*3.2) to indicate they are subject to high SEs and should be used with caution. Estimates with RSEs of greater than 50%, preceded by a double asterisk (e.g.**0.3), are considered too unreliable for general use and should only be used to aggregate with other estimates to provide derived estimates with RSEs of less than 25%.


MEANS AND MEDIANS

6 The RSEs of estimates of mean duration of insufficient work, median duration of insufficient work and mean preferred number of extra hours are obtained by first finding the RSE of the estimate of the total number of persons contributing to the mean or median ( see table T1) and then multiplying the resulting number by the following factors:
  • mean duration of insufficient work: 1.6
  • median duration of insufficient work: 2.5
  • mean preferred number of extra hours: 0.7

7 The following is an example of the calculation of SEs where the use of a factor is required. Table 4 shows that the estimated number of male underemployed part-time workers was 273,300 with a median duration of insufficient work of 26 weeks. The SE of 273,300 can be calculated from table T1 (by interpolation) as 6,400. To convert this to an RSE we express the SE as a percentage of the estimate or 6,400/273,300 = 2.3%.

8 The RSE of this estimate of median duration of insufficient work is calculated by multiplying this number (2.3%) by the appropriate factor shown in paragraph 6 (in this case 2.5): 2.5 x 2.3 = 5.8%. The SE of this estimate of median duration of insufficient work is therefore 5.8% of 28, i.e. about 2 (rounded to the nearest whole week). Therefore, there are two chances in three that the median duration of insufficient work for males that would have been obtained if all dwellings had been included in the survey would have been within the range 24-28 weeks, and about 19 chances in 20 that it would have been within the range 22-30 weeks.


PROPORTIONS AND PERCENTAGES

9 Proportions and percentages formed from the ratio of two estimates are also subject to sampling errors. The size of the error depends on the accuracy of both the numerator and the denominator. A formula to approximate the RSE of a proportion is given below. This formula is only valid when x is a subset of y.

Equation: Equation 2 tech note 2012 generic RSE

10 Considering the example from paragraph 3, of the 457,700 female underemployed part-time workers, 184,700 or 40.4% had insufficient work for 52 weeks and over. The SE of 184,700 may be calculated by interpolation as 5,400. To convert this to an RSE we express the SE as a percentage of the estimate, or 5,400/184,700 = 2.9%. The SE for 457,700 was calculated previously as 8,000, which converted to an RSE is 8,000/457,700 = 1.7%. Applying the above formula, the RSE of the proportion is:

Equation: Equation 3 tech note 2012

11 Therefore, the SE for the proportion of females who have a current period of insufficient work of 52 weeks or more is 0.9 percentage points (=(40.4/100)x2.3). Therefore, there are about two chances in three that the proportion of females who have a current period of insufficient work of 52 weeks or more was between 39.5% and 41.3% and 19 chances in 20 that the proportion is within the range 38.6% to 42.2%.


DIFFERENCES

12 Published estimates may also be used to calculate the difference between two survey estimates (of numbers or percentages). Such an estimate is subject to sampling error. The sampling error of the difference between two estimates depends on their SEs and the relationship (correlation) between them. An approximate SE of the difference between two estimates (x-y) may be calculated by the following formula:

Equation: Equation 4 tech note 2012 generic SE(x-y)

13 While this formula will only be exact for differences between separate and uncorrelated characteristics or subpopulations, it is expected to provide a good approximation for all differences likely to be of interest in this publication.


STANDARD ERRORS

T1 STANDARD ERRORS OF ESTIMATES

AUST.
NSW
Vic.
Qld
SA
WA
Tas.
NT
ACT
SE
RSE
Size of estimate (persons)
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
%

100
290
290
220
180
220
110
70
100
110
110.0
200
400
380
320
240
290
160
110
170
190
95.0
300
470
440
390
280
340
190
140
210
260
86.7
500
580
540
500
340
420
240
180
270
380
76.0
700
660
620
580
390
480
270
210
300
480
68.6
1,000
760
710
680
450
550
310
240
330
610
61.0
1,500
900
830
810
530
640
360
290
360
780
52.0
2,000
1 010
930
910
590
710
390
320
390
920
46.0
2,500
1 100
1 000
1 000
650
800
400
350
400
1 050
42.0
3,000
1 200
1 100
1 050
700
850
450
350
450
1 150
38.3
3,500
1 250
1 150
1 100
700
900
450
400
450
1 250
35.7
4,000
1 300
1 200
1 200
750
900
500
400
450
1 350
33.8
5,000
1 450
1 300
1 250
800
1 000
500
450
500
1 500
30.0
7,000
1 650
1 500
1 450
900
1 150
600
550
600
1 700
24.3
10,000
1 850
1 700
1 600
1 050
1 300
700
650
700
2 000
20.0
15,000
2 150
1 950
1 800
1 200
1 500
850
950
850
2 350
15.7
20,000
2 400
2 200
1 950
1 350
1 650
1 000
1 200
1 000
2 550
12.8
30,000
2 800
2 550
2 250
1 550
1 900
1 250
1 650
1 250
2 900
9.7
40,000
3 100
2 800
2 500
1 800
2 100
1 500
2 050
1 500
3 150
7.9
50,000
3 350
3 050
2 750
2 000
2 300
1 700
2 450
1 650
3 400
6.8
100,000
4 250
4 000
3 750
3 000
3 400
2 400
4 300
2 250
4 300
4.3
150,000
5 000
4 850
4 600
3 850
4 450
2 850
5 900
2 500
5 000
3.3
200,000
5 750
5 650
5 400
4 550
5 350
3 200
7 350
2 650
5 600
2.8
300,000
7 250
7 250
6 850
5 550
6 750
3 700
10 050
2 800
6 650
2.2
500,000
10 150
10 050
9 250
7 000
8 600
4 250
. .
2 800
8 350
1.7
1,000,000
15 100
15 250
13 200
8 900
10 950
4 850
. .
. .
11 750
1.2
2,000,000
20 350
22 550
17 700
10 600
12 700
. .
. .
. .
17 050
0.9
5,000,000
25 900
36 100
23 900
11 900
13 250
. .
. .
. .
28 450
0.6
10,000,000
27 750
49 750
27 950
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
37 950
0.4
15,000,000
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
42 850
0.3

. . not applicable

T2 levels at which estimates have relative standard errors of 25% and 50%(a)

NSW
Vic.
Qld
SA
WA
Tas.
NT
ACT
Aust.
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.

25% RSE

Mean duration of insufficient work
13 400
12 400
11 100
5 000
8 000
2 500
2 000
2 400
15 300
Median duration of insufficient work
32 600
28 900
27 400
15 700
18 500
6 800
70 600
9 600
28 700
Mean preferred number of extra hours
3 900
3 900
3 200
1 700
2 500
1 000
700
900
3 800
All other estimates
6 300
5 400
5 100
2 600
3 500
1 400
1 100
1 400
6 800

50% RSE

Mean duration of insufficient work
4 400
4 100
3 900
1 700
2 700
900
600
1 000
4 700
Median duration of insufficient work
10 900
9 700
10 100
5 400
6 300
2 400
4 500
3 100
9 900
Mean preferred number of extra hours
1 200
1 300
1 000
600
800
300
200
300
700
All other estimates
2 000
1 800
1 700
800
1 200
500
300
600
1 300

(a) Refers to the number of persons contributing to the estimate.